I’ve often wondered this myself: In the doom-and-gloom news cycle of climate change and environmental catastrophe, the continuing refrain always seems to be that, for all intents and purposes, we’re too late to correct our course through simple behavior modification. I don’t say this to be alarmist, but rather to be practical. If changing our lightbulbs and driving better cars isn’t going to fix this problem, we need to be thinking of different solutions.Fortunately, it seems like some scientists are. How practical their thinking is is a matter of debate, but in terms of creativity and excitement, they’re hitting it out of the park. To wit: How about placing giant mirrors in orbit between the earth and the sun to reflect some of the energy? OK, that’s on the expensive/outlandish end of the spectrum. But relative to the potential cost of unchecked climate change, it’s probably a small amount. Read about more solutions in the full New Scientist article.This reminds me of the failed plans to wrap a Swiss glacier in insulating foam.Photo by Flickr user db™.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

