Crashing A 1998 Toyota Into A 2017 Toyota Shows How Much Car Safety Has Evolved In Almost 20 Years

The best kind of auto insurance

It’s a safe bet that most drivers take for granted how far the science of automotive safety has taken cars in our lifetime. Aside from the notable developments like airbags, and lesser-celebrated mechanisms like anti-lock breaking systems and crumple zones, advancements in safety continue to plug along, regardless of whether or not the consumers and the media are paying attention.

Nowhere is that better illustrated than in this simple but profoundly telling video. The clip showcases a crash test between a 1998 Toyota and a 2015 Toyota, demonstrating just how big a difference all the little things make. Both cars boast many of the “big” features mentioned above (though, in 1998, American Corollas had airbags, while the Australian one in the video did not). Correspondingly, as the fallout demonstrates, the playing field is tilted heavily in favor of the more modern vehicle.

In the video, two Corollas from different generations were pitted against each other in “celebration” of the U.N.’s Global Road Safety Week.

After the impact, the two cars were graded on their resilience and safety according to current ANCAP (the Australian auto safety administration) standards.

The 1998 Corolla garnered a miserable zero-star rating. The sensors on the dummies indicated substantial injuries to the passengers’ heads, legs, and chests. The scientific score tallied was a lowly 0.4 out of 16.

The 2015 model fared astonishingly better, garnering five stars and almost 13 out of 16 points. Much of this can be attributed to the airbags, arguably the most crucial innovation since the seat belt, but efficiencies creating a bolstered structure also ensured that the occupants were much better off. Though it’s not made explicit in the video, the resilience of one structure could be attributed more to damage done to the colliding opponent, implying elements of a zero-sum game when it comes to the safety of a collision between one car with another.

In the video, ANCAP also points out the somewhat startling reality that often the more dangerous older cars are placed in the hands of the more dangerous drivers, both the extremely young and the elderly. Of course, ANCAP likely has ties to the automotive industry, whose business it is to sell upgraded new cars to drivers. But that doesn’t mean the agency was wrong when CEO James Goodwin said, "It is unfortunate we tend to see our most at-risk drivers—the young and inexperienced, as well as the elderly and more frail—in the most at-risk vehicles, and we hope this test promotes a conversation to encourage all motorists to consider the safety of their car."

The project, while eye-opening, isn’t the first of its kind, as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety performed a similar examination by colliding a 2009 Chevy Malibu with a 50-year-old 1959 Chevy Bel Air. The results, as you might expect given the wider gap in technology, were even more dramatic.


Four black women, Engineers Christine Darden and Mary Jackson, mathematician Katherine Johnson, and computer programmer Dorothy Vaughan, worked as "human computers" at NASA during the Space Race, making space travel possible through their complex calculations. Jackson, Johnson, and Vaughn all played a vital role in helping John Glenn become the first American to orbit the Earth.

They worked behind the scenes, but now they're getting the credit they deserve as their accomplishments are brought to the forefront. Their amazing stories were detailed in the book "Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race" by Margot Lee Shetterly, which was later turned into a movie. (Darden was not featured in the movie, but was in the book). Johnson has a building at NASA named after her, and a street in front of NASA's Washington D.C. headquarters was renamed "Hidden Figures Way."

Keep Reading Show less

Between Alexa, Siri, and Google, artificial intelligence is quickly changing us and the way we live. We no longer have to get up to turn on the lights or set the thermostat, we can find the fastest route to work with a click, and, most importantly, tag our friends in pictures. But interacting with the world isn't the only thing AI is making easier – now we can use it save the world, too.

Keep Reading Show less
Good News
Courtesy of John S. Hutton, MD

A report from Common Sense Media found the average child between the ages of 0 and 8 has 2 hours and 19 minutes of screen time a day, and 35% of their screen time is on a mobile device. A new study conducted by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital published in the journal, JAMA Pediatrics, found exactly what all that screen time is doing to your kid, or more specifically, your kid's developing brain. It turns out, more screen time contributes to slower brain development.

First, researchers gave the kids a test to determine how much and what kind of screen time they were getting. Were they watching fighting or educational content? Were they using it alone or with parents? Then, researchers examined the brains of children aged 3 to 5 year olds by using MRI scans. Forty seven brain-healthy children who hadn't started kindergarten yet were used for the study.

They found that kids who had more than one hour of screen time a day without parental supervision had lower levels of development in their brain's white matter, which is important when it comes to developing cognitive skills, language, and literacy.

Keep Reading Show less
via KTVU / YouTube

The 63-year-old Oakland-Alameda Coliseum, currently branded the RingCentral Coliseum, is one of the most decrepit sports venues in America.

The home to the the NFL's Oakland Raiders (until they move to Las Vegas next season) and MLB's A's, is notoriously known as the Black Hole and has made headlines for its frequent flooding and sewage issues.

One of the stadium's few positive aspects is its connection to public transportation.

Keep Reading Show less
Hero Video
via Anadirc / Flickr

We spend roughly one-third of our life asleep, another third at work and the final third trying our best to have a little fun.

But is that the correct balance? Should we spend as much time at the office as we do with our friends and family? One of the greatest regrets people have on their deathbeds is that they spent too much of their time instead of enjoying quality time with friends and family.

Lawmakers in the United Kingdom have made a significant pledge to reevaluate the work-life balance in their country.

Keep Reading Show less