Donald Trump Silver Linings: How The President Inadvertently Taught The Nation About Black History

His fumble had people furiously Googling who the famed abolitionist was

There were plenty of things to find distasteful about President Donald Trump’s Black History Month address (among them the fact that he used it as an opportunity to boast about his election victory), but none more disconcerting than his apparent unfamiliarity with the work of Frederick Douglass. In his incoherent speech, Trump made these remarks about the famed black abolitionist:

I am very proud now that we have a museum on the National Mall where people can learn about Reverend King, so many other things. Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more, I noticed. Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and millions more black Americans who made America what it is today. Big impact.

Does it … almost … sound as if the president of the United States doesn’t know who Frederick Douglass is? Does it also sound like he might be under the impression that Douglass … is still alive?

Douglass, in fact, died in 1895, and his autobiography, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, is a pretty common fixture in K-12 school curriculum. It’s one of most well-known texts of the slave abolitionist movement, and one of the most important pieces of American literature. But it makes sense that he wouldn’t know of it, given that the president doesn’t really read books.

Still, plenty of people in the country might not know much about Frederick Douglass, something we can blame on the failure of our education system, and the fact that what is termed “black history”—which is, essentially, the history of the United States as a country—is relegated to a single month of the year. There’s only enough time within that short period to teach kids about Dr. King and that one guy who invented peanut butter. This explains why “Frederick Douglass” shot up in popularity as a Google search term:

So there it is. One silver lining. Our commander in chief may be woefully ill-informed, but at least we have something to benefit from his ignorance.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading