Dropouts Find Their Way Back to School

Why Indianapolis is focusing on dropout recovery by helping students that have already dropped out earn high school diplomas.

Why Indianapolis is focusing not only on dropout prevention, but dropout recovery, by helping students that have already dropped out earn high school diplomas.

Since he dropped out of high school at 17, Frederick Dixson has wanted to continue his education.

Intermittently homeless, unemployed and locked up, he’s struggled in a variety of programs for dropouts.

Now 22, Dixson thinks he’s finally found a way to graduate. The only catch is that too many other dropouts are thinking the same thing.

Dixson is currently No. 104 on a waiting list of about 800 students at Indianapolis’ Excel Center, a charter school that opened this fall to give dropouts a second or third chance.

The center, operated by Goodwill Education Initiatives, set its enrollment at 200 students, then increased it to 300. But that isn’t enough. More than 1,000 dropouts of all ages have applied, and the applications keep coming.

There are other options for dropouts who want to get their education back on track, but the Excel Center is the only one in Indianapolis that caters exclusively to their needs.

The center, which is just west of the Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis campus, features small classes, is open from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. weekdays, and offers a wide range of academic and social supports.

The program is unusual in that it is not trying to prevent children from dropping out, but rather rescue those who already have. Nor is it trying to push dropouts toward GEDs—the typical strategy—but rather help them earn high school diplomas.

And that could be an important strategy in increasing the graduation rate in a city frequently cited as having one of the worst dropout problems in the nation.

The main strategy of the Indianapolis Public Schools has been to create smaller alternatives to its large high schools, with the goal of preventing those on the verge of dropping out from doing so.

“We’re trying to plug that hole,” Superintendent Eugene White said.

But to increase the district’s graduation rate, experts say, efforts also must target those such as Dixson who already have quit.

“We used to focus solely on dropout prevention, relying heavily on supplemental programs,” said Chris Sturgis of MetisNet, a consultant to foundations, states and school districts on high school reform.

But the focus is slowly widening, Sturgis said, and school systems are starting to look at dropout “recovery.”

Traditionally, dropouts who want to complete their education enroll in adult school or try to earn a GED. But GED-holders typically earn less and are more likely to be unemployed than high school graduates.

In Indianapolis, there’s no citywide outreach effort to make dropouts aware of options. They often rely on word-of-mouth to know what’s available. As a result, only the most motivated students return for their high school diplomas. And even then, they need to be lucky.

At the Excel Center, the 300 slots were filled using a lottery. About 800 other students were left to wait.

In Houston each year Superintendent Terry Grier joins teachers, principals, and volunteers to walk the streets in search of dropouts. They’ve found that often just a few minutes of conversation with an adult is all it takes.

Boston educators have also been known to regularly hit the streets in search of dropouts. They have opened a walk-in re-engagement center to help dropouts find the right programs. In 2008, Philadelphia opened such a center, and the demand has been so great that the city’s alternative programs all have long waiting lists.

These cities are aware of the long-term economic and social benefits of spending money to help dropouts earn a diploma. According to research by the Alliance for Excellent Education, a Washington-based education advocacy group, cutting Indianapolis’ dropout rate in half would produce a $30 million annual increase in consumer spending and $5 million in additional tax revenue.

“The piece that’s lacking here in Indianapolis is just that very thing: the recovery piece,” said Jennifer Oliver, a fellow for strategic initiatives at the University of Indianapolis’ Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning. “I think people are starting to realize the critical nature of this.”

Dixson was expelled in 10th grade from Tech High School for fighting. After spending time in a juvenile detention center, his first instinct was to return to his old school, but “they wouldn’t let me come back.”

Tech assistant campus administrator David Brunsting said the school lets in anyone younger than 18 because it’s legally obligated to do so. He said the school also generally takes back those older than 18, as long as it’s reasonable for them to graduate by the time they turn 22.

Brunsting hypothesized that Dixson had moved out of the school’s boundaries or didn’t have a parent with him when he tried to re-enroll.

Dixson wasn’t sure, but said it might have been a boundary issue. He said he didn’t receive any guidance on where else to go.

“I was just on my own,” he said. “Wasn’t nobody trying to help me.”

Unaware of his options, Dixson decided to drop out and get his GED. Once he was out of the system, no one tracked him down to try and bring him back.

Had Dixson been at a smaller high school, things might have turned out differently. At Indianapolis’ 450-student George Washington Community High School, for instance, keeping tabs on nearly everyone is feasible. When it comes to locating dropouts and finding flexible solutions to persuade them to re-enroll, Principal Deborah Leser said, “there isn’t much we won’t do.”

But most city schools are much larger. Tech, for example, has more than 2,000 students.

“Our focus is on the ones who are here. We have so many students who are chronically truant,” Brunsting said. “It would be almost impossible to then also go after the ones who’ve dropped out.”

Potential dropouts can be identified early on—by looking at their academics, attendance and behavior—although students drop out for numerous reasons. For some, such as Dixson, it was an expulsion. Others are overwhelmed or bored with school. Frequently, dropping out is a response to a personal issue, such as pregnancy or needing to look after an ailing family member.

Less is known about why students come back. A study conducted by California-based research group WestEd found that students primarily returned to school because they were unable to get jobs or because teachers or others at the school made intensive efforts to bring them back.

But the study also showed limited success. About 30 percent of dropouts followed in the WestEd study returned to high school; nearly 19 percent earned their diploma.

Dixson tried several GED programs, but never completed them and did not take the exam.

It was Excel’s classrooms thatfinally sold Dixson. Painted in soft blues and greens, the rooms are small, allowing for no more than 18 students. He hopes the small classes will make it easier for him to focus.

He says he’s ready to take school seriously this time around.

“I need my education,” Dixson said. “I need to do something.”

But for now, like hundreds of others, he waits.

A version of this article appeared in The Indianapolis Star.

Sarah Butrymowicz writes for the Hechinger Report.

This article was produced by the Hechinger Report. The nonprofit, nonpartisan education news outlet is affiliated with the Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media at Teachers College, Columbia University.


Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.

via The Howard Stern Show / YouTube

Former Secretary of State, first lady, and winner of the popular vote in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton, sat own for an epic, two-and-a--half hour interview with Howard Stern on his SiriusXM show Wednesday.

She was there to promote "The Book of Gutsy Women," a book about heroic women co-written with her daughter, Chelsea Clinton.

In the far-reaching conversation, Clinton and the self-proclaimed "King of All Media" and, without a doubt, the best interviewer in America discussed everything from Donald Trump's inauguration to her sexuality.

Keep Reading Show less

The healthcare systems in the United States and the United Kingdom couldn't be more different.

The UK's National Health Service is the largest government-run healthcare system in the world and the US's is largest private sector system.

Almost all essential health services in the UK are free, whereas in America cost can vary wildly based on insurance, co pays and what the hospitals and physicians choose to charge.

A medical bill in the US

One of the largest differences is cost. The average person in the UK spends £2,989 ($3915) per year on healthcare (most of which is collected through taxes), whereas the average American spends around $10,739 a year.

So Americans should obviously be getting better care, right? Well, the average life expectancy in the UK is higher and infant mortality rate is lower than that in the US.

RELATED: The World Health Organization declares war on the out of control price of insulin

Plus, in the U.S., only 84% of people are covered by private insurance, Medicare or Medicaid. Sixteen percent of the population are forced to pay out of pocket.

In the UK, everyone is covered unless they are visiting the country or an undocumented resident.

Prescription drugs can cost Americans an arm and a leg, but in the UK, prescriptions or either free or capped at £8.60 ($11.27).

via Wikimedia Commons

The one drawback to the NHS system is responsiveness. In the UK people tend to wait longer for inessential surgeries, doctor's appointments, and in emergency rooms. Whereas, the US is ranked as the most responsive country in the world.

RELATED: Alarmingly high insulin prices are forcing Americans to flock to Canada to buy the drug

The New York Times printed a fair evaluation of the UK's system:

The service is known for its simplicity: It is free at the point of use to anyone who needs it. Paperwork is minimal, and most patients never see a bill. … No one needs to delay medical treatment until he or she can afford it, and virtually everyone is covered. …

According to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States spent 17.2 percent of its economic output on health care in 2016, compared with 9.7 percent in Britain. Yet Britain has a higher life expectancy at birth and lower infant mortality.

Citizens in each country have an interesting perspective on each other's healthcare systems. UK citizens think it's inhumane for Americans have to pay through the nose when they're sick or injured. While Americans are skeptical of socialist medicine.

A reporter from Politics Joe hit the streets of London and asked everyday people what they think Americans pay for healthcare and they were completely shocked.