Excellent: More Californians Can Sell Solar Energy Back to the State

In California, if you have solar panels on your roof, you can sell the excess energy they generate back to your utility company. This...

In California, if you have solar panels on your roof, you can sell the excess energy they generate back to your utility company. This system-called "net metering" because you only pay for the net energy you need from your utility-is a big incentive to go solar. A family with a full set of panels might see its monthly energy bill go from $100 to about $1.But there's been a law on the books that limits how many people could take part in the net metering program. Until recently this cap was 2.5 percent. In other words, a utility would buy energy back from customers with solar panels until the total amounted bought reached 2.5 percent of the utility's peak demand.The utilities started approaching this limit last summer. Once they hit it, of course, buying solar panels would start to look like a bad deal because owners wouldn't be able to sell off the surplus energy. Thankfully, a bill just passed that will raise the cap to 5 percent:
The bill by Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, would allow utilities to buy up to 5 percent of their energy from customers. Current law limits those purchases to 2.5 percent. ... Supporters say the measure will increase the use of solar technology and offset high electricity costs. The current cap threatened to close the market to new solar users, said Bernadette Del Chiaro, a clean energy advocate at Environment California.
I don't know what the justification for this cap was in the first place. If someone is generating energy at home with solar panels why would we want to limit them from being able to sell it to the market?And net metering isn't just good for people with solar panels. It's good for all taxpayers:
[Net metering] allows California schools and public agencies to reduce operating costs by investing in solar energy. California public agencies have already installed at least 51 MW of solar, saving taxpayers more than $270 million in avoided utility payments. With federal stimulus funds committed to support the state's switch to solar, this legislation is a critical component of a fiscally and environmentally responsible energy future in California.
The utility companies were fighting this effort to raise the cap-I suspect that's because solar panels have the potential to really erode their customer base. It's good for our planet, and for the finances of California, that they didn't succeed.
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading