Fetal Position: The Political Fight Over the Health Risks of Abortion and Childbirth

The pairing of the data is conspicuous—in the developed world, few women make reproductive health decisions on the basis of possibility of death.

Abortion is safer than giving birth, according to a new study—but we already knew that. The study, published in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, compiled existing data to find that women are 15 times more likely to die in childbirth than they are during an abortion. About 1 in 11,000 women die giving birth, compared to the 1 in 167,000 women who die while undergoing legal abortions.

The pairing of the data is conspicuous—in the developed world, both childbirth and legal abortions are relatively safe procedures, and few women make reproductive health decisions on the basis of remote possibility of death. In both abortion and childbirth, the risk of death generally only influences a woman's decision in extreme cases—when the life of the mother is endangered by a problem pregnancy, for example, or when a woman is forced to secure an unsafe abortion in a place where it is not legal or accessible. Big-picture numbers hardly come into play.

Women should have access to the best data available to inform their reproductive health decisions, whether they use it or not. But this study is more political move than it is public service. State legislators often cite abortion's health risks when lobbying to increase restrictions on the procedure—whether by over-regulating abortion facilities or considering fetuses people. Of course, these laws are really predicated on moral arguments, not scientific ones. If the scientific community establishes that their numbers are wrong, they will find new numbers.

Anti-abortion rights activists are already getting a head start. "Study Claiming Abortion Safer Than Birth Totally Misleading," one said. The study is biased, said another. Even mainstream outlets are capitulating to the political posturing over the hard data. The Huffington Post called the study "controversial." TIME's report begins: "Abortions are considered high-risk, but..."

The defensive framing of this study may be necessary to combat political claims that abortion is "high-risk." But it also helps to drum up a false dichotomy between women who choose to have abortions and those who choose to give birth. Reproductive choice is not a number's game—women choose based on a number of personal factors, of which risk of death is only one. And they do not always choose the same way. Most women who undergo abortions are mothers already.

Photo via (cc) Flickr user jessica.diamond

via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading