Fixing Corporate Taxes Is a No-Brainer

Why do lawmakers ignore their constituents’ opinions on tax issues? Polling shows that large majorities of Americans want corporations to pay more in taxes, and yet President Obama and both parties in congress are committed to a corporate tax reform that is "revenue-neutral".

Why do lawmakers ignore their constituents’ opinions on tax issues? Polling shows that large majorities of Americans want corporations to pay more in taxes, and yet President Obama and both parties in Congress are committed to a corporate tax reform that is “revenue-neutral,” meaning corporate tax loopholes can be closed, but the revenue saved should be handed back to corporations as a reduced tax rate.

After researching tax issues and lobbying for stronger corporate tax provisions for several years, I can tell you that part of the problem is that few people, other than corporate lobbyists and the vastly outnumbered good government groups like mine, understand these issues. Senators don’t know the ins and outs of corporate taxes—how could they?—and when they need information, the corporate lobbyists show up and provide their skewed version of the facts.

Just to take an example, consider corporate America’s latest obsession, which is to get Congress to enact a “territorial” tax system. This is a euphemism for a corporate tax that completely exempts the offshore profits of our corporations. You might think a lawmaker would be wary of presenting such a proposal to her constituents. Build cars in China, you’re exempt from U.S. taxes, build cars in Detroit, pay the U.S. corporate tax!

One argument corporate lobbyists use to swindle lawmakers is that most developed countries have adopted territorialism, which proves—so goes the argument—that it’s the most workable way to tax multinational corporations. And while conservative and “moderate” lawmakers are never swayed by other developed countries’ examples when it comes to providing health care, subsidized education and training and those astoundingly long mandatory vacations, they’re suddenly all ears when it comes to looser tax rules for multinationals.

Anyway, these other countries don’t completely exempt their corporations’ offshore profits from their taxes, but the corporate lobbyists nonetheless claim that’s what America needs to do.

Here’s some background. The U.S. corporate tax system is already a mess. We don’t exempt the offshore profits of our corporations, but we do allow U.S. corporations to “defer” (delay) paying U.S. taxes on their offshore profits until they “repatriate” those profits (bring those profits to the U.S.). This creates two problematic incentives for corporations.

First, corporations can reduce their tax bill if they shift operations (and jobs) to a country with a lower corporate tax rate, because they can “defer” their U.S. corporate taxes indefinitely. This is a real problem, but it’s also important to note that most countries where American companies do real business do not have lower corporate taxes than the U.S. A study we published a year ago found that most profitable Fortune 500 companies pay lower taxes on their U.S. operations than on their foreign operations—which flies in the face of corporate lobbyists’ constant complaint that U.S. taxes are killing their companies.

Second, even if U.S. corporations don’t actually move their operations offshore, they can use shady transactions to make their U.S. profits appear to be earned by subsidiaries in countries with very low or even no corporate tax at all (i.e., offshore tax havens). These “subsidiaries” are often nothing more than a post office box, and the tax havens are often small countries where there is little real business.

A territorial system would make both these problems worse. If allowing U.S. corporations to defer paying taxes on their offshore profits encourages them to shift jobs and profits offshore, then completely eliminating U.S. taxes on those profits will only increase those incentives.

And the reality is that European countries are having a lot of problems with their territorial tax systems. Ireland and the Netherlands, for example, have played starring roles in tax avoidance schemes used by Google and other companies that are known as the “Double Irish” and the “Dutch Sandwich.”

The smart way to reform our international corporate tax rules is to simply repeal deferral so that U.S. corporations are taxed the same whether their profits are earned here or abroad. The corporate folks complain that this amounts to double-taxation, but that’s completely untrue because there’s already a tax credit in place that allows corporations to reduce their U.S. tax bill by the amount of taxes they’ve already paid to foreign governments.

Too many members of Congress are loath to offend corporations, but they also feel pressure to rein in the budget deficit and they’re looking for revenue. If the alternative is cutting popular programs like Medicare, Social Security and education, the answer may become so obvious that even politicians figure out the right thing to do.

Photo via Flickr (cc) user 401(k) 2012.

Center for American Progress Action Fund

Tonight's Democratic debate is a must-watch for followers of the 2020 election. And it's a nice distraction from the impeachment inquiry currently enveloping all of the political oxygen in America right now.

For most people, the main draw will be newly anointed frontrunner Pete Buttigieg, who has surprisingly surged to first place in Iowa and suddenly competing in New Hampshire. Will the other Democrats attack him? How will Elizabeth Warren react now that she's no longer sitting alone atop the primary field? After all, part of Buttigieg's rise has been his criticisms of Warren and her refusal to get into budgetary specifics over how she'd pay for her healthcare plan.

The good news is that Joe Biden apparently counts time travel amongst his other resume-building experience.

Keep Reading Show less
Official White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert

This election cycle, six women threw their hat in the ring for president, but is their gender holding them back? Would Americans feel comfortable with a woman leading the free world? Based on the last election, the answer is a swift no. And a new study backs this up. The study found that only 49% of American men would feel very comfortable with a woman serving as the head of the government. By comparison, 59% of women said they would feel comfortable with a woman in charge.

The Reykjavik Index for Leadership, which measures attitude towards women leaders, evaluated the attitudes of those living in the G7 countries as well as Brazil, China, India, and Russia. 22,000 adults in those 11 countries were surveyed on their attitudes about female leadership in 22 different sectors, including government, fashion, technology, media, banking and finance, education, and childcare.

Only two countries, Canada and the U.K., had a majority of respondents say they would be more comfortable with a female head of state. Germany (which currently has a female Chancellor), Japan, and Russia were the countries least comfortable with a female head of state.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

If you are totally ready to move on from Donald Trump, you're not alone. According to a report last April from the Wason Center National Survey of 2020 Voters, "President Trump will be the least popular president to run for reelection in the history of polling."

Yes, you read that right, "history of polling."

Keep Reading Show less
via Around the NFL / Twitter

After three years on the sidelines, Colin Kapernick will be working out for multiple NFL teams on Saturday, November 16 at the Atlanta Falcons facility.

The former 49er quarterback who inflamed the culture wars by peacefully protesting against social injustice during the national anthem made the announcement on Twitter Tuesday.

Kaepernick is scheduled for a 15-minute on-field workout and an interview that will be recorded and sent to all 32 teams. The Miami Dolphins, Dallas Cowboys, and Detroit Lions are expected to have representatives in attendance.

RELATED: Joe Namath Says Colin Kaepernick And Eric Reid Should Be Playing In The NFL

"We like our quarterback situation right now," Miami head coach, Brian Flores said. "We're going to do our due diligence."

NFL Insider Steve Wyche believes that the workout is the NFL's response to multiple teams inquiring about the 32-year-old quarterback. A league-wide workout would help to mitigate any potential political backlash that any one team may face for making an overture to the controversial figure.

Kapernick is an unrestricted free agent (UFA) so any team could have reached out to him. But it's believed that the interested teams are considering him for next season.

RELATED: Video of an Oakland train employee saving a man's life is so insane, it looks like CGI

Earlier this year, Kaepernick and Carolina Panthers safety Eric Reid reached a financial settlement with the league in a joint collusion complaint. The players alleged that the league conspired to keep them out after they began kneeling during the national anthem in 2016.

Before the 2019 season, Kaepernick posted a video of himself working out on twitter to show he was in great physical condition and ready to play.

Kaepnick took the 49ers to the Super Bowl in 2012 and the NFC Championship game in 2013.

He has the 23rd-highest career passer rating in NFL history, the second-best interception rate, and the ninth-most rushing yards per game of any quarterback ever. In 2016, his career to a sharp dive and he won only of 11 games as a starter.