GOOD

NASA Crowdsources Martian Living With Their "Journey to Mars Challenge"

To help establish a permanent presence on the red planet, NASA turns to the public.

image via (cc) flicker user nasamarshall

1969’s Apollo 11 moon landing was one of, if not the most, significant scientific events in the history of the human race. For the first time, human beings had slipped free of their planetary confinement, not simply to float in orbit around our own world but to step foot on an entirely new one, instead. The live images of Neil Armstrong’s descent onto the Lunar surface captivated the world, and brought our entire species together in a brief moment of pure possibility. To date, it’s a moment that is yet to be matched in terms of sheer global significance. But that could change in the coming decades, as NASA readies itself for a manned mission to Mars.


image via (cc) flickr user eldave

Unlike the Cold War-tinged Apollo moon missions, though, NASA’s Martian goal is not one pressured by geopolitical considerations. Rather, it represents a jubilant step (or, perhaps a “giant leap”) forward in the common-denominating spirit of exploration and progress. It’s in that same spirit, then, that NASA is opening their doors and asking the public to not only help put people on Mars, but to keep them there, as well.

The “Journey to Mars Challenge” is the space administration’s just-announced competition to crowdsource the best and brightest ideas for establishing a practical, sustained presence on the Martian surface. As a NASA release explains:

NASA is embarking on an ambitious journey to Mars and Tuesday announced a challenge inviting the public to write down their ideas, in detail, for developing the elements of space pioneering necessary to establish a continuous human presence on the Red Planet. This could include shelter, food, water, breathable air, communication, exercise, social interactions and medicine, but participants are encouraged to consider innovative and creative elements beyond these examples.

Participants with winning submissions will receive award money from a $15,000 pot, which NASA expects to divide into three shares of $5,000. With cash (and, presumably, an eventual shot at a Martian application) on the line, it’s clear that NASA isn’t interested in half-baked ideas scribbled on cocktail napkins. Instead, they’re looking for “technical submissions” complete with “the assumptions, analysis, and data that justify their value.”

In other words: Serious ideas only.

Which isn’t to say that the space administration doesn’t want participants to have some fun with their entries. “Creativity” is high on the list of judging criteria, alongside relevance, simplicity, resource efficiency, feasibility, comprehensiveness, and scalability.

If you think you have what it takes to be one of the pioneering scientific minds behind mankind’s eventual Martian presence, check out the “Journey to Mars Challenge” details on the competition’s Innocentive contest page.

Articles
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading
Culture

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading