The price of providing remedial training is costly. The Alliance for Excellent Education estimates the nation loses $3.7 billion a year because students are not learning basic needed skills, including $1.4 billion to provide remedial education for students who have recently completed high school.
Recently, I had an opportunity to chat with Kati Haycock, president of the advocacy organization Education Trust, which focuses most of its work on closing achievement gaps that leave low-income and minority students behind. The problem of remediation and college- and career-readiness was a big topic of our chat, especially in light of the new Common Core State Standards proposed by the National Governors Association in March. Here's what Haycock said:
The basic goal here, especially on the college side of college- and career-ready, is to have higher education agree that the new "proficient" means ready to begin credit-bearing work in college without the need for remediation. The ultimate test of that is: Will higher education use these assessments as their assessment of college readiness and not retest students with another test to throw them into remedial courses?
As Haycock emphasized, ending remediation will require colleges and K-12 educators to be on the same page with regard to what level of reading, writing, and mathematics is necessary for success in higher education.
The bonus is that doing so will save us all some money.