Canadian Judge Says Muslim Woman Isn’t #SuitablyDressed for Court

The judge postponed her case because she wouldn’t remove her hijab.

Rania Al-Alloul. Screencap of CBC News video.

A Canadian judge revealed herself to be a racist, bigoted jerk when she refused to hear the case of a Muslim who wears the hijab. Judge Eliana Marengo told Rania Al-Alloul that she wasn’t “suitably dressed” for the court and that she would have to remove the headscarf if she wanted to present her case. Al-Alloul, who was in court to get her car back after it was impounded by the police, refused to do so. Judge Marengo then adjourned court.

“When she insisted I should remove my hijab, really I felt like she was talking with me as... not a human being,” Al-Alloul told CBC News. “I don't want this thing to happen to any other lady. This is not the work of a judge. She doesn't deserve to be a judge."

The whole courtroom exchange was captured on a tape obtained by CBC News,

"Hats and sunglasses for example, are not allowed. And I don't see why scarves on the head would be either," Judge Eliana Marengo is heard saying on the tape. "The same rules need to be applied to everyone. I will therefore not hear you if you are wearing a scarf on your head, just as I would not allow a person to appear before me wearing a hat or sunglasses on his or her head, or any other garment not suitable for a court proceeding."

Unfortunately, no one was available at the time to tell Judge Eliana Marengo that her racism was unsuitable for civilized company. The internet, however, soon caught wind Al-Alloul’s story and birthed a hashtag campaign in her defense. A Canadian lawyer named Amna Qureshi posted a photo of herself wearing the headscarf and holding a placard that read, “#SuitablyDressed”. Others followed suit, challenging the notion of “suitable dress” and defending the right to wear religious clothing. A GoFundMe campaign raised more than $48,000 to buy Al-Alloul a new car.

Despite the outcry, a spokesperson for the courthouse said on Friday that it supports Judge Marengo’s decision, exhibiting a real contempt for the dictates of basic human decency.

via National Nurses United/Twitter

An estimated eight million people in the U.S. have started a crowdfunding campaign to help pay for their own or a member of their household's healthcare costs, according to a survey released Wednesday.

The poll, which was conducted by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago, also found that in addition to the millions who have launched crowdfunding efforts for themselves or a member of their household, at least 12 million more Americans have started crowdfunding efforts for someone else.

Keep Reading
via Library of Congress

In the months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the military to move Japanese-Americans into internment camps to defend the West Coast from spies.

From 1942 to 1946, an estimated 120,000 Japanese Americans, of which a vast majority were second- and third-generation citizens, were taken from their homes and forced to live in camps surrounded by armed military and barbed wire.

After the war, the decision was seen as a cruel act of racist paranoia by the American government against its own citizens.

The internment caused most of the Japanese-Americans to lose their money and homes.

Keep Reading

Step by step. 8 million steps actually. That is how recent college graduate and 22-year-old Sam Bencheghib approached his historic run across the United States. That is also how he believes we can all individually and together make a big impact on ridding the world of plastic waste.

Keep Reading
The Planet