How Is Your State Evaluating Its Teachers?

It's agreed that value-added teacher data alone isn't sufficient for assessing a teacher's performance. So what else are state's looking at?

Teacher effectiveness is all the rage in education circles these days, thanks largely to the Los Angeles Times' release of value-added data for third- and fifth-grade teachers. The ratings, based on students' performance on standardized tests before and after entering a certain instructor's classroom, are controversial and educators are in full agreement that these measures shouldn't be the sole determinant of a teacher's competence.

Nevertheless, New York City, Washington, D.C., and, of course, L.A. have all been ground zeroes for fights over the how best to evaluate teachers. But throughout the country, different states are evaluating their teaching force differently. D.C.'s IMPACT system, instituted under former Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, has been criticized for not picking up a lot of what teachers do aside from preparing students for standardized tests. Many of the assessment metrics include performance pay incentives, in some cases, using the prospect of increased pay to entice teachers to give up protections, such as tenure.

An article this weekend in The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel summarizes some of the different evaluation models employed in states and school systems around the country. Interestingly, until recently, Wisconsin had a law barring the state from using student test scores to judge teachers.

From the article:

• Tennessee and Delaware, which were rewarded in the first round of the Obama administration's $4 billion Race to the Top competition for offering teacher merit pay and factoring student test scores into evaluations. The competition offered millions of dollars in federal schools money to states with the best plans to improve education.
• Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island and Washington, D.C.—the winners in the second round of Race to the Top—all have instituted rewards for effective teachers and principals.
• Louisiana, where a new law requires half of a teacher's evaluation by 2012-13 to be based on growth in student test scores.
• Colorado, which passed legislation this year that ties teacher and principal evaluations to student growth and makes it tougher for teachers to get tenure.
• Thirteen states with districts implementing TAP: The System for Teacher and Student Advancement, a model that defines and measures effective teaching, links evaluations to professional development, and allows teachers to earn bonuses based on growth in student test scores.

Via The Hechinger Report; photo (cc) via Flickr user Old Shoe Woman

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading