What are the key elements to breakthrough research? Time, risk, and the possibility of failure, says a new paper out of MIT. These factors, which encourage creativity and out-of-box thinking, are "much more likely" to yield innovative and influential research as compared to the kind of short-term, results-oriented research that is the norm.The report, titled "Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences," opens with a great anecdote about a scientist who, when he was awarded a grant from NIH, was was strongly discouraged from pursuing a certain study-it just seemed too out there. He pursued it anyway, and in 2007 won the Nobel Prize for a technique he'd developed thanks to that initial research.There are countless other examples, and they all point to this same idea: That the short-term research project model-de rigeur at research universities-is not without merit, but doesn't yield the kind of breakthrough innovation the longer-term grants do, either. I imagine their research can be fairly applied to other kinds of grant giving as well, from the nonprofit and foundation world, say.You can read the entire paper here.
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
We have a small favor to ask of you
Facebook is critical to our success and we could use your help. It will only take a few clicks on your device. But it would mean the world to us.
Here’s the link . Once there, hit the Follow button. Hit the Follow button again and choose Favorites. That’s it!
The Latest
Most Popular
Sign Up for
The Daily GOOD!
Get our free newsletter delivered to your inbox