How To Invest $1 Trillion In Social Enterprise? Rate 'Em!

Fifteen major investors are buying into a new rating agency for social enterprise in the next major step toward realizing the sector's potential.

Any entrepreneur will tell you a major obstacle to getting a company off the ground is finding investors. It’s doubly hard in the world of social enterprise, a relatively new sector that combines profit seeking with social impact goals—and unlike dollars and cents, there’s no standard set of metrics for social impact.

To solve this problem, the Global Impact Investment Rating System opened for business this week to pave the way for $1 trillion in capital to reach social enterprises over the next decade. Think of GIIRS (pronounced "gears") as a kind of Standard & Poors for the do-gooder capitalist, rating both individual companies’ social impact and that of socially responsible investment funds.

“We can’t build an industry for impact investments without credible, comparable metrics on impact,” Andrew Kassoy, a GIIRS co-founder, said. “GIIRS has the potential to catalyze hundreds of billions of dollars of sidelined investment capital to flow to the world’s most inspiring and talented entrepreneurs. These businesses demonstrably create high quality jobs that increase economic opportunity here and abroad.”

Fifteen major social impact investors—organizations that want to put their money to work for themselves and the world—have announced they will rely on GIIRS.

Among them are major financial players like J.P. Morgan and Prudential; groundbreaking social impact investors like RSF Social Finance and the Calvert Foundation; and even a major international financial institution, the Inter-American Development Bank.

Big names like that represent legitimacy for the fledgling ratings organization, and $1.5 billion in assets under management means a significant chunk of the impact investment market share is now engaged with GIIRS.

As GOOD reported last month, GIIRS is a project of B Lab, the nonprofit helping combat other structural obstacles to social enterprise, including legal challenges that come with the traditional corporate framework.

The goal of GIIRS is to provide companies with standardized reporting metrics that they can send to investors, so they won’t have to worry about jumping through four different kinds of hoops, much as the Common Application does for college-bound high school seniors.

Investors, on the other hand, won’t deal with a variety of different metrics from each company they’re considering. That baseline standard will also come with benchmarks, so that a social enterprise’s impact can be compared to the other firms in its field.

That means if you’re not the best water development company in the sector, you’ll have a tougher time attracting investors' funding—creating exactly the kind of competitive incentives that give social enterprise the potential to be more effective than traditional nonprofits.

Lowering the cost of social impact due diligence will also lower the barrier to entry, not just for institutional investors, but for individuals looking to become social impact investors. One participating fund, the Calvert Foundation, lets people buy into its funds for just $20.

“This is going to encourage mainstream investors to start looking at a different aspects of their investments, and encourage mainstream fund managers to take into account these types of issues that have traditionally been ignored,” Taryn Goodman, an investment manager at RSF Social Finance, says.

via Alan Levine / Flickr

The World Health Organization is hoping to drive down the cost of insulin by encouraging more generic drug makers to enter the market.

The organization hopes that by increasing competition for insulin, drug manufacturers will be forced to lower their prices.

Currently, only three companies dominate the world insulin market, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Over the past three decades they've worked to drastically increase the price of the drug, leading to an insulin availability crisis in some places.

In the United States, the price of insulin has increased from $35 a vial to $275 over the past two decades.

Keep Reading Show less

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Since the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in 1986, whale populations have been steadily recovering. However, whales in the wild still face other dangers. In the summer of 2018, four Russian companies that supply aquariums with marine animals captured almost 100 beluga whales and killer whales (aka orcas). After a public outcry, those whales are swimming free as the last of the captive whales have been released, the first time this many captured whales have been released back into the wild.

In late 2018 and early 2019, a drone captured footage of 11 orcas and 87 beluga whales crammed into holding pens in the Srednyaya Bay. The so-called "whale jail" made headlines, and authorities began to investigate their potentially illegal capture.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

The 2020 election is a year away, but Donald Trump has some serious ground to cover if he doesn't want it to be a historical blowout.

A Washington Post- ABC News poll released Tuesday shows that Trump loses by double digits to the top Democratic contenders.

Vice President Joe Biden (56%-39%); Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (54%-39%); Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont (56%-39%); South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg (52%-41%); and Sen. Kamala Harris of California (52%-41%) all have big leads over the president.

Keep Reading Show less