GOOD

How to Make More Money Selling Mobile Ads: Easy, Sell More of Them

Sometimes I wonder if one of the reasons people increasingly like consuming media on mobile devices (in addition to plain old convenience) is because there's just less crap. Pop-ups aren't as much of an issue, there are fewer ads—or smaller ads—and publishers have to present a lean experience—smaller navs, for instance.


The conventional wisdom is that you can only fit one ad on a mobile phone screen, which is one of the reasons there's so little money being made in mobile advertising. It's a real challenge for lots of folks, from news organizations to giants like Google and Facebook.

But Facebook may make $1 billion on mobile ads in the next year. And The Atlantic points out that one way they'll do it is by effectively adding more advertising:

The strategy now is to pick the low-hanging fruit: Slip subtle sponsored ads (or "stories") into mobile users' feeds.

\n

So: More crap. Simple solution for now. But where's the real solution?

Articles
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading
Culture

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading