Shark fins are in short supply, and interested parties don’t always agree on how they should be apportioned. Connoisseurs of certain East Asian delicacies think shark fins should be used for shark-fin soup. Sharks, on the other hand, think they should be used for swimming.The sharks got some help last week. From the BBC:European Union countries are the main exporter of shark fins to China, where they are used to make shark-fin soup. A meeting in Brussels on Thursday drew up an action plan on “finning”, which results in the deaths of the sharks. …Environment groups claimed current law on finning-cutting fins off the living shark and dumping the low-value carcass at sea-was not strict enough.Good news. There are lots of great soups out there (minestrone, French onion, etc.) that don’t require the mutilation of threatened sharks.Photo by flickr user Y-Not ? under a (cc) license.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

