"Netflix for Baby Clothes" to Help Parents Waste Less

Having a baby doesn't always mean you have to buy a ton of stuff.

For many parents to-be, the onslaught of baby stuff begins the moment they make it public that they're expecting. Toys, bottles, bibs, diapers, pacifiers, baby monitors, strollers... The list of presents and purchases rattles on and on, challenging any parent's best efforts to reduce waste and cut back on consumption. When expecting mother and Stanford Institute of Design fellow Caroline O'Connor began processing the mountains of baby clothes given to her, she realized that what would be truly helpful would be receiving exactly the right-sized clothes at exactly the right time, delivered to her home in neat bundles.

The result of her epiphany is the start-up Plum, "Netflix for baby clothes," as the website describes it. The San Francisco-based subscription service aims to make new parents' lives a little bit easier and less wasteful by providing them with the clothes they need only when they need them, allowing subscribers to send clothing back when their infants have outgrown them. Just like with Netflix, parents can drop the too-small clothes in a pre-stamped envelope the moment their kids move on to the next thing. Before long, the next size will arrive in the mail, laundered with environmentally friendly detergent and smelling of lavender.

Kids go through clothing so quickly, it makes a lot of sense to not spend tons of money buying new stuff that will probably end up in the trash every three months. However, as with any sort of sharing service, there's always the 'ick'-factor; for Plum to succeed, the challenge will be making parents OK with mini-rompers that once had other people's baby's spit-up all over them.

Image (cc) by Flickr user Micah Sittig

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading