GOOD

There Are Too Many Studies, New Study Finds

Researchers say there is an “attention decay” in science.

Photo by Flickr user U.S. Army RDECOM.

If you ever feel overwhelmed by the constant production of new research studies, imagine how scientists feel—they have to read the actual studies, and not just rudimentary summaries by journalists who have only a 10th grade understanding of science, like myself. A new study published by researchers in California and Finland finds that the volume of scientific literature produced is so massive that it has had a deteriorating effect on the attention spans of scholars and scientists. The researchers measured citation rates of published papers and discovered that scientists “forget” recent papers more easily than ones published in the past.


“We found that this has to do with the exponential growth in the number of publications, which inevitably accelerates the turnover of papers, due to the finite capacity of scholars to keep track of the scientific literature,” they write in their conclusion.

The growing number of publications also has a devaluing effect on the results of published studies. The more studies there are, the more likely a paper will become “obsolete”.

Articles
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading
Culture

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading