Overfishing Is Emptying The World’s Oceans Of A Vital Nutrient Supply: Fish Pee

Eating all the big fish means depriving coral of their big bladders

Image via Flickr, USFWS

Unless you’re seven years old with a brand new goldfish, you probably don’t spend a lot of time thinking about fish pee. As it turns out, fish urine should be at the forefront of our minds since it aids marine biodiversity. And lately, there hasn’t been enough to go around as a result of our insatiable human demand for big fish—aka the big bladders that help the ocean go round.

In a study published in Nature Communications last Tuesday, author Jake Allgeier argues that overfishing has widespread consequences for the natural nutrient cycle that regulates biodiversity but also coral reef health. Allgeier, who’s a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Washington, said in an interview with National Geographic, “It’s kind of a funny thing to say that we would conserve for fish pee. But it is hopefully setting a precedent to think about these reefs differently.”

According to Allgeier’s in-depth research of Caribbean reefs, a delicate recycling process dictates how corals form, survive, and ultimately process nutrients back into a cyclical food chain. Without fish urine, coral reefs have a hard time gathering vital nutrients, which makes sense seeing as they can’t swim in search of alternative food sources.

The process for figuring out how much a fish pees is a pretty brutal one that involves trapping fish in seawater-filled bags, analyzing the water, and then freeze-drying the water to be crushed into a powder. According to National Geographic, coauthors Abel Valdivia and Courtney Cox (the marine biologist, not the Cougar Town actress) cataloged 143 different species of coral from 43 different reefs to analyze the relationship between coral and fish. The team found that while heavily fished areas did not greatly reduce the number of species, the lack of big fish slashed the amount of pee reaching the reefs.

The study’s authors hope this information helps people better understand the delicate balance that keeps our oceans functioning.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading