The Climate-crusading Highest Bidder

In late 2008, a multi-million dollar Bureau of Land Management land auction–one that was set to turn over hundreds of thousands of acres of...

In late 2008, a multi-million dollar Bureau of Land Management land auction–one that was set to turn over hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands in southern Utah to oil and gas companies–was disrupted by a quiet, 27-year old economics student who simply walked in and started bidding. Today, Tim DeChristopher, aka Bidder70 is facing two felony charges for this act of civil disobedience. We spoke with DeChristopher about his motivation and whether he thinks it was all worth it.

What was your problem with the BLM auctions?

The auction had been rushed through. It was announced on election day, November 4th, when no one was paying attention, and there was a lot of objection to it on a lot of grounds. One, that it was for lands right outside of Canyonlands and Arches National Parks and some of the really amazing red rock areas out there. Another big objection was that the Bureau of Land Management wasn’t following their own rules. They hadn’t done an adequate environmental impact statement, they hadn’t talked to other environmental agencies like the National Park Service. Despite the objections, the auction was going forward.

My biggest concern was that they hadn’t even considered the climate impacts. For me there was this fundamental immorality about the auction.

So what happened that day in December?

There was going to be a protest outside the auction, and I went down for that, but on the drive down, I decided that I wanted to push harder than just holding a sign. I really wanted to take a stand and disrupt this auction, to do whatever I could, whether that might be yelling, or giving a speech, or throwing a shoe, or something like that. But when I walked into the lobby, the official there asked if I was there for the auction, and I said, “yes, I am,” and she asked, “Would you like to be a bidder?” And I said, “yes I would.”

Is it illegal to bid? Assuming you could’ve raised the money and actually paid for the leases?

It’s not entirely clear with oil leases. I had signed a piece of paper downstairs saying that it was a federal offense to bid without intent to pay. But I decided I could live with those consequences, and I couldn’t turn my back on this chance to make an impact. So I started out just driving up prices. And then I started winning some parcels. Pretty soon–I was winning every parcel. And then they stopped the auction.

What were the reactions of other bidders?

When I was driving up the prices there was a lot of muttering. Some people clearly knew what I was doing. When I started winning the parcels, people started talking to federal agents: “I think something’s up, you better stop this guy.”

How many parcels did you actually win?

I won 14 parcels, covering 22,500 acres. My bids totaled $1.8 million.

What’s become of the leases then?

The irony is that when the new administration took over, the new head of the Interior [Ken Salazar] overturned all the leases—not just the leases that I won, but all the others from that auction as well. He’s made it very clear that the auction itself was illegal, and that the whole process was corrupt. He’s used very bold language to describe it.

Even during this legal limbo, you’ve founded an organization, Peaceful Uprising, dedicated to taking direct action to combat the climate crisis. Why do you feel direct action is necessary, rather than working within the system?

You know how Gandhi said you have to “be the change you want to see in the world.” Well the change that most of us wish to see is a carbon tax, but our leaders aren’t doing that for us, so Gandhi’s call is then for us to be the carbon tax. What does that mean—to “be the carbon tax?” To cost the fossil fuel industry money in any way that we can. Getting in their way, slowing them down, shutting them down. Doing whatever we can to be that tax. It forces our leaders to make a choice—to either be more explicit in their war on the young generation, to to get serious about stopping climate change.

So the system itself isn’t equipped to tackle this problem?

One of the critiques that the prosecution throws out about my action is that if I objected to what was going on, I had legal alternatives to object. The question is whether that’s at all reasonable, whether I could’ve trusted this system. The auction happened months after the Mineral Management Service, a branch of the BLM, were exposed literally taking bribes of sex and drugs from fossil fuel industry executives. So, what, am I going to appeal to the oil industry themselves? The corporate influence in our entire system is the thread that runs through this whole story.

Do you have any regrets?

None at all. It’s been much more effective and a more positive experience than I ever could’ve expected. I made the choice to do this because I thought it was worth the sacrifices to keep the oil in the ground and to give us a better chance at a livable future. I didn’t know just how fulfilling it would be. And how much of an effect it would have on others, that it would radiate beyond just protecting those 22,000 acres from drilling.

After being postponed multiple times, Tim DeChristopher’s trial date is set for June 21st. Follow his story or offer support at

Photo by Cliff Lyon

This post originally appeared on, as part of GOOD's collaboration with the Pepsi Refresh Project, a catalyst for world-changing ideas. Find out more about the Refresh campaign, or submit your own idea today.
Center for American Progress Action Fund

Tonight's Democratic debate is a must-watch for followers of the 2020 election. And it's a nice distraction from the impeachment inquiry currently enveloping all of the political oxygen in America right now.

For most people, the main draw will be newly anointed frontrunner Pete Buttigieg, who has surprisingly surged to first place in Iowa and suddenly competing in New Hampshire. Will the other Democrats attack him? How will Elizabeth Warren react now that she's no longer sitting alone atop the primary field? After all, part of Buttigieg's rise has been his criticisms of Warren and her refusal to get into budgetary specifics over how she'd pay for her healthcare plan.

The good news is that Joe Biden apparently counts time travel amongst his other resume-building experience.

Keep Reading Show less
Official White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert

This election cycle, six women threw their hat in the ring for president, but is their gender holding them back? Would Americans feel comfortable with a woman leading the free world? Based on the last election, the answer is a swift no. And a new study backs this up. The study found that only 49% of American men would feel very comfortable with a woman serving as the head of the government. By comparison, 59% of women said they would feel comfortable with a woman in charge.

The Reykjavik Index for Leadership, which measures attitude towards women leaders, evaluated the attitudes of those living in the G7 countries as well as Brazil, China, India, and Russia. 22,000 adults in those 11 countries were surveyed on their attitudes about female leadership in 22 different sectors, including government, fashion, technology, media, banking and finance, education, and childcare.

Only two countries, Canada and the U.K., had a majority of respondents say they would be more comfortable with a female head of state. Germany (which currently has a female Chancellor), Japan, and Russia were the countries least comfortable with a female head of state.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

If you are totally ready to move on from Donald Trump, you're not alone. According to a report last April from the Wason Center National Survey of 2020 Voters, "President Trump will be the least popular president to run for reelection in the history of polling."

Yes, you read that right, "history of polling."

Keep Reading Show less
via Around the NFL / Twitter

After three years on the sidelines, Colin Kapernick will be working out for multiple NFL teams on Saturday, November 16 at the Atlanta Falcons facility.

The former 49er quarterback who inflamed the culture wars by peacefully protesting against social injustice during the national anthem made the announcement on Twitter Tuesday.

Kaepernick is scheduled for a 15-minute on-field workout and an interview that will be recorded and sent to all 32 teams. The Miami Dolphins, Dallas Cowboys, and Detroit Lions are expected to have representatives in attendance.

RELATED: Joe Namath Says Colin Kaepernick And Eric Reid Should Be Playing In The NFL

"We like our quarterback situation right now," Miami head coach, Brian Flores said. "We're going to do our due diligence."

NFL Insider Steve Wyche believes that the workout is the NFL's response to multiple teams inquiring about the 32-year-old quarterback. A league-wide workout would help to mitigate any potential political backlash that any one team may face for making an overture to the controversial figure.

Kapernick is an unrestricted free agent (UFA) so any team could have reached out to him. But it's believed that the interested teams are considering him for next season.

RELATED: Video of an Oakland train employee saving a man's life is so insane, it looks like CGI

Earlier this year, Kaepernick and Carolina Panthers safety Eric Reid reached a financial settlement with the league in a joint collusion complaint. The players alleged that the league conspired to keep them out after they began kneeling during the national anthem in 2016.

Before the 2019 season, Kaepernick posted a video of himself working out on twitter to show he was in great physical condition and ready to play.

Kaepnick took the 49ers to the Super Bowl in 2012 and the NFC Championship game in 2013.

He has the 23rd-highest career passer rating in NFL history, the second-best interception rate, and the ninth-most rushing yards per game of any quarterback ever. In 2016, his career to a sharp dive and he won only of 11 games as a starter.