GOOD

Refugees, You Have a Friend in Canada




It’s time to face some facts: As it stands now, it would take a small miracle to get Samy legally resettled into the United States. I’m not yet ruling it out, and neither is he, and there are certainly still some unlikely avenues worth exploring. But the bureaucratic systems that enable refugee resettlement in the United States and Thailand remain at odds, and have the end effect of putting Samy in a deadlock indefinitely.

Which doesn’t mean we’re going to stop trying to find a way to make it work. But it does mean it’s time to consider some other feasible final destinations for Samy—specifically, countries with more flexible immigration laws than the United States. There aren’t as many as you might think, but there are nations out there that allow refugees entry on a less-strict basis, and some that even allow their citizens to sponsor particular refugees’ resettlement directly, like Australia and Canada.

Here’s where it gets really interesting: it just so happens that Samy may have found another ally in a Canadian named William, who met Samy shortly after I did. He’s currently preparing Samy’s resettlement application for the Canadian government, which means that as it stands, the Great White North is the leading contender for becoming Samy’s new home.

But why is Canada so different from the United States? Marina Sharpe, our ever-handy, always-sagely human rights lawyer, explains: “The theory is that Canada wants to be a safe haven for persecuted people. And Canada recognizes that there are people in need of international protection who don’t meet the [United Nations'] very restrictive definition, and that there are people who maybe are refugees but can’t access refugee status because the country they fled to hasn’t signed the Convention—or for whatever reason.”

Canada’s government is aware—and I think the U.S. government should be as well—that the technical definition of a refugee excludes hundreds of millions of people who face threats like persecution, hunger, and disease exposure in their country of origin. This includes Samy: He’s persecuted, stateless, and unable to return home, and yet according to the United Nations, he is not technically a refugee. Which is why Canada’s more flexible resettlement criteria may give him a much better shot at starting a new life than the States can.

“Basically a lot of Canadian groups, especially church groups, have availed themselves of this Canadian law, that allows a group of Canadians to bring a person of humanitarian concern—so it doesn’t have to be a refugee—to Canada for resettlement, provided that the people bringing the person to the sponsors make an undertaking to support the person financially,” Sharpe says.

And that’s where the other big difference lies. In Canada, if you want to sponsor a refugee yourself, then there’s a legal framework in which you can do so. The sponsor will typically join a group of other people interested in helping, pledge to support the refugee, and make a commitment to financially support him or her for at least a year. “They allow these people to come to Canada provided they won’t become a burden on the state, which is why private individuals undertake to sponsor them,” Sharpe says. She calls this “another route,” noting that “it’s entirely outside the refugee sphere.”

The most proactive thing an American can do to help an individual refugee is either A) Donate some cash to, volunteer with, or find a job with a refugee group that does this sort of work, or B) Do what I’m doing and try your best to haplessly advocate for the individual, which includes making a bunch of long distance phone calls really late at night, bothering nice aide workers, and damning yourself to consistent frustration. (B is not recommended.)

This Canadian route is huge: It means that the biggest catch—the fickle, esoteric Thai government agency that hasn’t granted Samy refugee status—may actually have a straightforward workaround.

Which brings us back to William, a man who, it turns out, may be in a far better position to help Samy than I. Because he’s Canadian.
Articles
via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.





Culture
Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet