Should New Promise Neighborhoods Include Charter Schools?

Winners of grants for 21 new "Promise Neighborhoods" based on the Harlem Children's Zone were announced today. Will they need charter schools to work?

The Obama administration yesterday announced the winners of planning grants for the development of "Promise Neighborhoods" around the country. The communities are inspired by the Harlem Children's Zone, which provides everything from charter school educations to so-called "wraparound services," such as asthma prevention and career counseling programs, all designed to improve the educational outcomes of children living in the nearly 100-block area.

According to Education Secretary, Arne Duncan, who spoke with education reporters via conference call this afternoon, there were more than 300 applicants for the grants and 21 winners, who will receive up to $500,000. Duncan also noted that the number of winners was limited to 21 by the $10 million in funds that the Office of Innovation and Improvement had on hand to mete out. He added that there were 100 excellent applications, and he hopes that by releasing the results of the competition, local corporations and philanthropic organizations will step in and help develop these communities.

The centerpieces of the template Harlem Children's Zone are its two Promise Academy charter schools. Earlier this year, a Brookings Institution study argued that by comparing its students' test scores to those of other New York charter schools, the wraparound services provide no apparent academic benefit—that it's simply the curriculums at these charter schools that are improving outcomes.

When asked whether charter schools will be at the center of each of these new Promise Neighborhoods, Duncan said that these new developments are taking a number of different tacks to ensure one common goal:

What they all have in common is saying quality public education has to be at the heart of this work. So, some include charter schools, many include traditional public schools, many will also be in the business of turning around chronically underperforming schools. So this is about communities where educational outcomes haven't been what any of us would want and there's again tremendous courage and leadership to challenge the status quo and get dramaticallyy better. That's going to look very different depending on the community.


It's easy to forget that kids growing up with the bounds of the Harlem Children's Zone are also attending several traditional public schools in the area. And it may very well be these kids who are getting the most benefit from the community's wraparound services.

Sara Mead, a senior associate with Bellwether Education Partners, argued just that point in the wake of the Brookings study in a post on Education Week's Policy Notebook blog:

But I'm more curious about what, if any, HCZ's social and community services have on children who live in the zone but do not attend the Promise Academy charter schools. This is an important question for two reasons: First, proponents of a more social-services based approach sometimes seem to be arguing for social and community services as a substitute for school reforms, rather than a complement to them--so it's important to know what the relative impacts and cost-effectiveness of school-based reforms and social/community services interventions are. Second, there are a lot more kids in the Harlem Children's Zone service area (about 8,000) than there are enrolled in the schools (about 1,200), so it's important to know if HCZ is making a difference for those kids.


She goes onto quote researchers from Harvard's Education Innovation Laboratory who had found "'substantial anecdotal evidence that Harlem Children's Zone was unsuccessful in the years before opening the charter schools.'" Still, hard data has been, well, hard to come by.

One hopes that when it does, it will show that a community banding together to create, effectively, an incubator that churns out young adults who are well-prepared for life and careers is an unequivocal success. Provided that Congress doesn't slash its funding, we'll soon have tens of Promise Neighborhoods around the U.S. trying to prove that's, in fact, the case—and that there are multiple ways to get there besides relying on charter schools.

Photo via Department of Education.


The global climate change strikes on Friday are said to have been the largest protest for climate change in history. An estimated four million people participated in 2,500 events across 163 countries on all seven continents. That included an estimated 300,000 Australians, but a total of zero were in Hyde Park in Sydney, despite a viral photo that claims otherwise.

Australian Youth Coal Coalition, a pro-coal Facebook page, posted a photo showing trash strewn across a park after what appears to have been a large event. "Look at the mess today's climate protesters left behind in beautiful Hyde Park," the photo was captioned. "So much plastic. So much landfill. So sad." The only problem is, the photo wasn't taken after a climate change protest. It wasn't even taken in Australia.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via GOOD / YouTube

Last Friday, millions of people in 150 countries across the globe took to the streets to urge world leaders to enact dramatic solutions to combat climate change.

The Climate Strike was inspired, in part, by Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old girl from Sweden who has captured worldwide attention for her tireless work to hold lawmakers responsible for the climate crisis.

The strike gave people across the planet the opportunity to make their voices heard before the U.N. General Assembly Climate Summit in New York City on Monday.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

As world leaders meet to discuss new ways to tackle climate change at the U.N. Climate Action Summit, they might miss one very big part of healing nature – nature. In a new short film, youth climate change activist Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot, a writer for the Guardian, talked about how we need to use nature as a solution to climate change.

There's a huge push to curb emissions, but it's not the be all end all of handling climate change; we also need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. While we don't have technology to do that for us, there is another solution. "There is a magic machine that sucks carbon out of the air, costs very little, and builds itself. It's called a tree," Monboit says in the film. Researchers found that we could get rid of two-thirds of the carbon dioxide that we've emitted during the industrial era just by growing trees. That amounts to 205 billion tons of carbon. Right now, deforestation of tropical forests is responsible for 20% of current greenhouse emissions.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Climate Action Tracker

In 2016, 196 countries signed the Paris Agreement, pledging to combat climate change by taking action to curb the increase in global temperatures. The Paris Agreement requires countries to report on their emissions and what steps they're taking to implement those plans. Now that the countries are coming together again for the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York City, it's worth taking a look at what kind of progress they've made.

The Climate Action Trackerkeeps tabs on what each country is doing to limit warming, and if they're meeting their self-set goals. Countries are graded based on whether or not their actions would help limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.

According to a recent article from National Geographic, The Gambia, Morocco, and India are at the head of the class. "Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco, and India are expected to rise, they'll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit," the article reads. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States, on the other hand, get a big fat F. "Projected emissions in Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United States are far greater than what it would take to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet