Toxic 100: Meet the Country's Worst Air Polluters Toxic 100 Air Polluters: The Companies Ruining Our Nation's Air

An index and ranking of companies based on the chronic human health risk they create.

It's no news flash that big corporations pollute. But do you ever wonder which are the worst offenders? University of Massachusetts' Political Economy Research Institute has a tool to clue you in.

Released last year, the Toxic 100 Air Polluters index identifies the companies that our polluting our country's air. The index is based on data of air released of hundreds of chemicals from industrial facilities and sites throughout the country. The rankings don't rely solely on the quantity of the releases, but also factor in the toxicity of the chemicals and "transport factors such as prevailing winds and height of smokestacks, and the number of people exposed."

Professor James Boyce, co-director of PERI's Corporate Toxics Information Project, explained:

We assess not just how many pounds of pollutants are released, but which are the most toxic and how many people are at risk. People have a right to know about toxic hazards to which they are exposed. Legislators need to understand the effects of pollution on their constituents.”


The 10 worst offenders?

You can click on any of the companies to see summaries of their pollution impacts and data on all of their individual facilities.

You can also use the Toxic 100 site to search for companies that didn't spew enough toxic filth to make the list. It doesn't have every company in the country (no Seventh Generation listed, for example), but I tried about half a dozen different big industrial and utility companies and it had all of those.

Perhaps most interesting, the index now includes data on how the pollution disproportionately affects minorities and low-income communities. Now we've got to find a better way to visualize this data. Anyone know of any good data viz of this? Should we create one?

Big thanks to Michael Cote for the tip.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading