Let's Remind Trump What A Real Witch Hunt Looked Like

Merriam-Webster comes to the rescue yet again

Images via Wikipedia

Donald Trump isn’t known for being a wordsmith—or even getting most words right. He boldly ignores spell-check when tweeting, and he can’t seem to get a handle on the difference between council and counsel. Lately, he called the investigation into his campaign’s potential collusion with Russian officials a “the single greatest witch hunt” in American history, which brings us to the question: Does Trump know what a witch hunt is?

According to Trump’s biggest fan, online dictionary Merriam-Webster, a witch hunt is defined as “a searching out for persecution of persons accused of witchcraft” or “the searching out and deliberate harassment of those (such as political opponents) with unpopular views.” As Merriam-Webster explained when the word started trending on its site on Thursday, the first meaning has to do with the literal hunting and persecution of perceived witches in centuries past. English speakers began using the second, figurative meaning of the phrase in the 1920s.

Normally, we could assume he meant the latter version, having to do with harassment of political opponents, but knowing Trump, he could very well be thinking of voodoo dolls and cauldrons as well. If so, there are a few key differences between Trump’s situation and the most infamous witch hunt in history, the Salem witch trials of 1692. According to Smithsonian, hysteria infected colonial Massachusetts after a minor war on the border of New York and Canada sent a surge of refugees south. By the time the conflict between wealthy landowners and poor, displaced northerners settled down, more than 200 had been tried for witchcraft, and 20 had been executed.

Obviously, there was no sound basis for pursuing those accused of witchcraft. For the most part, town leaders went after impoverished women who had female friends. In Trump’s case, however, there are several sound reasons for pursuing an investigation, which he further fueled by dismissing FBI Director James Comey last week. According to a memo obtained by the The New York Times, Trump reportedly pressured Comey to stop his investigation into disgraced national security advisor Michael Flynn’s involvement with Russia. An independent, unbiased investigation into this matter isn’t a witch hunt; it’s a necessity.

In reality, Trump uses the word in a kind of Orwellian doublespeak, accusing others of what he has done himself. Look no further than the way he’s openly attacked journalists, given every shade of critic the broad label of “fake news,” incited hysteria among his fan base via the birther movement, or repeatedly called for Hillary Clinton’s imprisonment—and the list goes on and on. Indeed, pursuing a thorough investigation into Trump’s ties with Russia will be necessary, if only for the sake of defending both democracy and the English language.

Photo by Josh Couch on Unsplash

Christopher Columbus, Alexander Hamilton, William Shakespeare, and Sir Walter Scott are getting company. Statues of the famous men are scattered across Central Park in New York City, along with 19 others. But they'll finally be joined by a few women.

Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Sojourner Truth are the subjects of a new statue that will be on display along The Mall, a walkway that runs through the park from 66th to 72nd street. It will be dedicated in August of next year, which is fittingly the 100-year anniversary of the 19th Amendment that granted women the right to vote.

Currently, just 3% of statues in New York City are dedicated to women. Out of 150 statues of historical figures across the city, only five statues are of historical women, including Joan of Arc, Golda Meir, Gertrude Stein, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Harriet Tubman.

Keep Reading Show less

It's easy to become calloused to everyday headlines with messages like, "the world is ending" and "everything is going extinct." They're so prevalent, in fact, that the severity of these statements has completely diminished to the point that no one pays them any attention. This environmental negativity (coined "eco-phobia") has led us to believe that all hope is lost for wildlife. But luckily, that isn't the case.

Historically, we have waited until something is near the complete point of collapse, then fought and clawed to bring the species numbers back up. But oftentimes we wait so long that it's too late. Creatures vanish from the Earth altogether. They go extinct. And even though I don't think for a single second that we should downplay the severity of extinction, if we can flip this on its head and show that every once in a while a species we have given up on is actually still out there, hanging on by a thread against all odds, that is a story that deserves to be told. A tragic story of loss becomes one about an animal that deserves a shot at preservation and a message of hope the world deserves to hear.

As a wildlife biologist and tracker who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of animals I believe have been wrongfully deemed extinct, I spend most of my time in super remote corners of the Earth, hoping to find some shred of evidence that these incredible creatures are still out there. And to be frank, I'm pretty damn good at it!

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

For more than 20 years. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) has served the citizens of Maine in the U.S. Senate. For most of that time, she has enjoyed a hard-fought reputation as a moderate Republican who methodically builds bridges and consensus in an era of political polarization. To millions of political observers, she exemplified the best of post-partisan leadership, finding a "third way" through the static of ideological tribalism.

However, all of that has changed since the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Voters in Maine, particularly those who lean left, have run out of patience with Collins and her seeming refusal to stand up to Trump. That frustration peaked with the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Keep Reading Show less
NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less
via / Flickr and Dimitri Rodriguez / Flickr

Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign looks to be getting a huge big shot in the arm after it's faced some difficulties over the past few weeks.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a leading voice in the Democratic parties progressive, Democratic Socialist wing, is expected to endorse Sanders' campaign at the "Bernie's Back" rally in Queens, New York this Saturday.

Fellow member of "the Squad," Ilhan Omar, endorsed him on Wednesday.

Keep Reading Show less