Are the tides changing in China’s controversial business dealings in Africa? Sure seems so. China appears to be “tightening purse strings” on the continent, backing away from big deals with politically unstable regimes. Which is interesting because, of course, China has been criticized in the past few years for doing exactly the opposite: Turning a blind eye to rogue regimes in favor of business few countries will touch with a 10-foot pole.We wrote about this about a year ago, and a lot has changed in a short period of time (though certain country’s relations have been strained for some time). China, which, critics like to say, was all too happy to do business with the “bad guys” is now looking for the same thing Western business looks for in international investment: economic and political stability.The pressing question, which I can’t answer, is: What happens to countries like Guinea, which badly need infrastructure investment and have come to rely on foreign capital, if the big money dries up?Image by Olivier Asselin for The New York Times
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

