GOOD

Who Can Change the World? Is it You, Sweet Potato Fries?

Something I think about a lot is the incredible act of changing consumer behavior through outstanding innovation or salesmanship.

This week, I've seen a few notes on the failure (and on the perhaps-too-early reportage of the failure) of mobile wallet apps. Why are they "failing?" A pretty reasonable guess is that they're not solving a problem that consumers have.


Fine—good reason. But, come on, we're talking about Google here. The new Google. The Google that no longer has time or patience for things that didn't make an impact. You're telling me that they don't know how to make me pay for beans with my phone? They can build robot cars and make them street legal and I'm still carrying around pennies?

Something I think about a lot is the incredible act of changing consumer behavior with innovation or salesmanship so impressive that it reorders priorities or invents new ones. Somebody asked me for an example of what I'm looking for today.

I told him that, for a simple example, I had my eye on a restaurant chain, Native Foods. It's a vegan restaurant chain. It seems to me for that chain to succeed, consumers' behavior has to change. Why? Well, about 3.2 percent of Americans eat vegetarian and 0.5 percent vegan. You don't have to be vegetarian to eat at Native Foods—while I follow a mostly vegetarian diet, I've been there with very carnivorous friends and they've dug it—but realistically it does take somebody who is vegan, vegetarian, or pretty openminded to spend money there and, ideally for the restaurant, become a regular.

I think it's awesome that a vegan restaurant chain exits, and I do know a fair number of vegans and vegetarians, but these are often folks who bristle a little at the idea of hitting a chain of any kind all that frequently. Maybe they'll make exceptions; I don't know, but no matter what, the success of Native Foods seems to depend on some combination of these changes in consumers' regular behavior:

1) People eating more vegan food.

2) Vegans and vegetarians eating at a restaurant chain location more frequently.

I could be wrong! (Work at Native Foods? Get in touch!) And this isn't to say I don't think it's going to work. I'm just saying that it's why I'm particularly interested in the success of the chain and the speed of its growth. These changes would represent real steps forward in, at the very least, consumers' carbon footprint. (If you haven't seen the recent studies, they're throwing around words like "catastrophic.")

But say I'm right. Is that behavior change coming from a place that solves a problem for consumers? In the sense that sweet potato fries solve problems, sure, I guess so. Is it solving a problem for the environment? It's a couple steps in the right direction. That's what I'm interested in—businesses getting out ahead like that, how they do it, why they do it, and what they learn and can share with the next round of folks who want to do well while doing good.

Photo via Flickr (cc) user ironypoisoning.

Articles
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading
Culture

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading