A few weeks ago, Price blogged about a Time poll conveying that Jon Stewart is America’s most trusted newsman. Whether the results truly signify a dearth of trustworthy anchors in contemporary news hasn’t definitively been answered. But for the man to be this popular, he’s got to have fans on both sides of the aisle. That notion is at first surprising-given Stewart’s clearly liberal perspective-but not ridiculous. Jacob Gershman of New York explains why, for example, neoconservative pundits are so taken with The Daily Show‘s irreverent host.Conservatives like Stewart because he’s providing them a platform to reach an audience that usually tunes them out. And they often find that Stewart takes them more seriously than right-wing political hosts, who are often just using them to validate their broad positions, do. Stewart will poke fun, but he offers a good-faith debate on powder kegs – torture, abortion, nuclear weapons, health care – that explode on other networks.With an exception or two, Gershman makes a convincing case, quoting the likes of William Kristol, Cliff May, and John Bolton-a trio of men who offer some sincere, if measured, praise for Stewart. Any conservative readers care to weigh in?Via Buzzfeed.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

