The school needs the money and the painting is worth $140 million. Should they sell, or hold onto a cultural masterpiece?
Raecker says that kind of money can be used to set up a trust fund that would be impervious to the fluctuations of the state budget, and could potentially generate $5 million a year. He also doesn't believe the painting's currently doing any good for the school since it hasn't been on display there since 2008. That year floods caused extensive damage to the university's art museum, and the painting was sent for display to Chicago and to Davenport, Iowa. Selling the painting was suggested after the floods when the school needed money for water damage repairs. The idea didn't fly with school officials back then, and it's not going over well now.
Sean O'Harrow, the director of the university's art museum says the idea is "ludicrous".
"It's like selling your grandmother. I don't think you can sell your culture. Doing such a thing would only give ammunition to those people who criticize our state as a place where we don't respect or appreciate culture. There is no way that can happen."
\n
Although it's true the school does need the money, maybe there's something right about holding onto parts of our enduring cultural heritage. After all, no matter how bad the French economy gets, we don't see them trying to cash in by putting the Mona Lisa up for sale.
photo via the University of Iowa