Back to the Foundry: Can a Jewelry Company Really Prevent Conflict in Africa?

Social entrepreneur Peter Thum fields readers' questions about his company, Fonderie 47.

Thum destroys a rifle in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Last week, we told you about Fonderie 47, a social enterprise that sells jewelry made from AK-47s and funds programs that destroy the weapons in Africa. Fonderie 47’s founders, Peter Thum and John Zapolski, hope that reducing the presence of the now-ubiquitous assault rifles in Africa will in turn reduce conflict, which undermines economic development efforts.

In the comments, many readers had questions about whether their model would work, suggesting that getting guns out of Africa isn’t the best way to help, or that this is the wrong way to go about it. We’re big proponents of skepticism when it comes to social enterprise and good works in general—talking about social impact isn’t the same as making it—so GOOD got in touch with Thum and presented your concerns to him.

Several readers questioned whether funding the destruction of these weapons would actually increase the price of the weapons and help keep them out of the wrong hands. Some readers wondered if raising the price of the weapons would simply benefit arms traffickers.

“That’s a normal, natural question for people to point at,” Thum says. “What we’ve learned is that the average price of an AK-47, which can act as a proxy for assault rifles in general because they represent about 70 percent of assault rifles in Africa, is about $130 in Africa and $570 in worldwide. The reduction of supply of cheaper, older weapons in Africa means that the replacement cost is about $340 more.” That, in turn, will help make it harder for people to obtain the rifles.

Thum’s company funds NGOs like the Nobel Prize-winning Mines Advisory Group, which destroys caches of small arms like AK-47s as well as other discarded munitions, including landmines. Local governments, developed nation donors like the United States, and international institutions typically fund projects like MAG’s, and Fonderie 47 is trying to supplement its donations with a steady stream of funding from the enterprise. That’s especially important at a time when many developed countries are looking to cut foreign aid under budget pressure.

Fonderie 47 doesn’t just show up and start buying guns from random people, Thum says. The weapons they destroy are collected by governments or the United Nations during post-conflict disarmament. “There are weapons that are located at a government facility which is in a location where they can be readily stored and destroyed,” Thum says. “Then there are weapons that have been collected somewhere, usually in a place near a battlefield, they haven’t been transported, people are fighting… they end up getting locked up in a container and they have to be dealt with [through] a weapon destruction workshop to cut them up.”

If the NGOs that governments hire to destroy these weapons don’t have the resources to do it, they wait around for the next group of people to come take them. Destroying them eliminates that possibility, making the reemergence of conflict more costly.

Readers also wondered about the price of the jewelry sold by Fonderie 47, where a pair of cufflinks can run $35,000. There’s a pretty small market of people who can spend that much on an accessory—wouldn’t a mass-market product allow the company to scale better and do more good?

Thum admits the jewelry, sold through its website and at private events, is “exclusive in price,” but says that’s by design. “We wanted the things that we made to in and of themselves be art,” he says. “Jewelry and art, those things are acquired by people with significant resources and influence to change things. We wanted to get leaders interested in what we were doing and make things that made people think, we felt that making pieces that were exceptional with this material would change the way that people thought about this material, not making things that were mundane or specifically engineered to achive a certain price.” The market for products made by Fonderie 47 is between 90 and 100 billion dollars around the world, Thum says, so he is confident that there is room for his company to produce significant sales.

Other readers felt like targeting guns was a waste a time of when Africa faces so many other distressing development problems.

Thum’s previous social enterprise, Ethos Water, helped fund water development projects in Africa. While visiting project sites in Kenya, Thum saw people carrying AK-47s and realized, as many development professionals have, the inextricable link between development and security. MAG’s website highlight’s a quote from former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan: "There will be no development without security and no security without development."

Finally, some readers wondered why Thum’s company was focused on violence in Africa and not in the United States.

“I would be curious to see what would happen,” Thum says. “If I were a reader, I would pose the same question again. It’s a good one. The discussion that they’re having about what we’re doing is precisely one of the outputs we’re hoping to have for what we do. Actual discussion of this issue has been so rare as to almost be immeasurable. If we were to provoke someone among your readers to want to do something about this in their own way, that would be even better.

Photos by Martina Bacigalupo courtesy of Fonderie 47

via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?


Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less