Bring Snacks (or Else): Professor Who Canceled Class Might Be on the Right Track

Cal State Sacramento psychology professor George Parrott walked out of class after students didn't bring snacks.

Want to take psychology professor George Parrott's class at California State University at Sacramento? If so, you better be prepared to bring homemade snacks to class. Without them, Parrott will decline to teach the class, a policy he followed through on last week when the students who had signed up for snack duty didn’t bring the agreed-upon munchies to their three-hour lab. After Parrott walked out, a few students complained, and now the university administration is investigating.

At first glance, Parrott's snack rule seems like the quirk of a tenured professor—he’s been on the job since 1969 and started his snack rule shortly thereafter. But the professor—who rarely eats the snacks himself—told Inside Higher Education that his requirement is educational, not culinary. He says he's teaching students to "work together, to set a schedule, to work in teams to get something done, and to check up on one another, since everyone depends on whoever has the duty of bringing snacks on a given week." Parrott believes that his walkout taught students "an important lesson" that will serve them well throughout both their academic career and work experience: They need to be able to count on each other, and if someone doesn’t follow through with a task, it’s a big deal.

Parrott also defended his snack mandate by noting that plenty of research "shows that students learn more if they develop the skills to work in teams, to assume responsibility for projects, and get to know their fellow students." That’s a lot more difficult to facilitate in large classes, he says. He says when he was a student, lab classes might only have a dozen students, and it was easy for students to develop a personal relationship with each other and with the professor. "Those days are long gone," he says.

Indeed, Parrott’s lab class is supposed to only have 42 students, but thanks to the budget cuts in the Cal State system, there are 52 students enrolled this semester. Bringing snacks, he says, helps breaks down the formal barriers between students and professors. And because lab classes are so long, he’d need to give students a break to get something to eat anyway.

It's well established that students who have close relationships with their peers or professors are less likely to drop out. At a time when only 30 percent of adults over 25 have a degree and only 56 percent of college students earn a degree in six years, colleges are looking for ways to ensure that students feel like they belong on campus. Maybe Cal State Sacramento should be applauding Parrott's efforts to build community on campus rather than launching an investigation.

If officials do demand an end to his snack policy, Parrott says he'll "probably ignore" them. This is his last semester teaching before retirement, and he intends to go out with his snack rule in full effect.

Photo via (cc) Flickr user ZapTheDingbat

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading