Jeff Schweitzer of HuffPo guffaws at the notion that anyone can reliably predict the future-especially on Wall Street. (Peter Schiff, anyone?) Nevertheless, the rest of the internets are ablaze with soothsaying bloggers. Here’s a roundup of predictions from all over:According to BusinessWeek, consumers will continue to inch toward austerity, oil will creep back up in price, and more and more jobs will disappear (but we will bottom out, economically). There will also be a slew of big time mergers-a Bloomberg-organized transformation of The New York Times into a nonprofit, the swallowing of BP by Shell, and a combination of Chrysler and GM among them.TorrentFreak boasts Five File-sharing Predictions for 2009-one of which involves all of us becoming socialists. (Via Digg.)Archinect has too many predictions from too many designers, architects, and bloggers to enumerate here.In the same fashion, Inhabitat collected prophesies from a number of environmental movers and shakers. Here’s what they had to say.Michelle Malkin expects that a trillion-dollar stimulus of package will fail to deliver results.The film and television industry offers a sneak preview of more layoffs and less production-not business as usual.And finally, for some reason, one psychic forsees that Sarah Silverman and Tina Fey will fight. Useful!(Photo: “2009 … Bang or Bust?” by Above. Via Wooster.)
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

