Hillary Clinton’s Winning Strategy: The Pragmatic Progressive

How populist appeal mixed with realpolitik experience could be a winning combination for the democratic frontrunner.

image via (cc) flickr user marcn

Tuesday evening’s first Democratic party primary debates offered something of a mixed bag for those watching on CNN, as well as the candidates, themselves. While lacking in the frenzied free-for-all atmosphere of the GOP primary debates, each the five candidates vying for the top slot on the democratic ticket still had their moments of verbal bombast in an attempt to define themselves as a the most viable contender for the White House. But, no matter how many sound-bites and screen-grabs last night’s debate may have generated, analysts seem to agree that the democratic primary field remains largely as it was before the candidates took to their podiums: Hillary Clinton still leads the pack, Bernie Sanders continues to be a dark horse (albeit a surprisingly strong one), and Webb, Chafee, and O’Malley are largely non-factors in the race.

Still, for as much as things may have stayed the same, last night’s debate offered a glimpse at something new for at least one of the candidates—A way for Hillary Clinton to meld her experience as a longtime member of Washinton’s ruling class, with the same sort of populist fervor propelling Bernie Sanders to previously unexpected heights in the polls. Enter, the Pragmatic Progressive.

After being pressed by debate moderator Anderson Cooper to answer charges of a shifting political identity based on expediency and self-interest, this is what Clinton had to say when finally asked whether she was a progressive or not:

“I'm a progressive. But I'm a progressive who likes to get things done. And I know how to find common ground, and I know how to stand my ground, and I have proved that in every position that I've had, even dealing with Republicans who never had a good word to say about me, honestly. But we found ways to work together on everything from reforming foster care and adoption to the Children's Health Insurance Program, which insures 8 million kids. So I have a long history of getting things done, rooted in the same values I've always had.”

Here’s the entire exchange:

On one hand, Clinton’s answer is rooted in a problem faced by every candidate with a track record in Washington: How to answer for a career filled with evolving opinions and necessary political deal-making without quoting Whitman’s “Song of Myself.” On the other, her answer demonstrates a keen understanding what makes her closest primary challenger such a potent force—and how to exploit his biggest weakness.

It’s no understatement to say that Bernie Sanders is riding a wave of popular support for his unabashedly progressive message of righting income inequality, and bringing a measure of economic justice to a country still reeling from the 2008 global financial crisis. He is pugnacious, direct, and seems to care little for the subtle art of political presentation which so many other candidates spend years trying to perfect. Regardless of his decades in public service, Sanders in many ways comes across as having the same sort of populist outsider appeal as Donald Trump, albeit with astronomically different politics. He may not have enough widespread appeal to win a presidential election (or even a primary) but he’s hyper-energized a segment of the electorate who seem hungry for both authenticity and wholesale change.

Clinton, meanwhile, has been dogged by accusations of secrecy regarding her private email server, and alternating political convictions. That is why casting herself as “a progressive who likes to get things done,” is such potentially significant move on her part. It taps into the excitement of Sanders’ grassroots appeal, while subtly re-frames the accusations of her waffling as being ultimately in the service of what lately has seemed entirely out of reach for Washington: Actual results—results, it’s implied, that Sanders has been unable to deliver himself. What’s more, it’s an answer that keeps one eye on the general election, during which Clinton can use the same line to highlight accomplishments in the face what will likely be cast as Republican obstructionism, regardless of who the GOP candidate ends up being.

Ultimately, Clinton’s pivot toward pragmatic progressivism is the sort of judo-esque maneuver that hopes to take a significant knock against her as a candidate and turn it into an even more significant strength. Whether it will resonate with voters, however, remains to be seen.

via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading

Childbirth is the number one reason American women visit the hospital, and it ain't cheap. In fact, it's getting more and more expensive. A new study published in Health Affairs found that the cost of having a baby with employer-sponsored health insurance increased by almost 50% in the past seven years.

The study evaluated "trends in cost-sharing for maternity care for women with employer-based health insurance plans, before and after the Affordable Care Act," which was signed into law in 2010. The study looked at over 657,061 women enrolled in large employer-sponsored health insurance plans who delivered babies between 2008 and 2015, as these plans tend to cover more than plans purchased by small businesses or individuals.

Keep Reading

A meteorite crashed into Earth nearly 800,000 years ago. The meteor was 1.2 miles wide, and the impact was so big, it covered 10% of the planet with debris. However, scientists haven't been able to find the impact site for over a century. That is, until now. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal believes the crash site has been located.

Tektites, which are essentially rocks that have been liquefied from the heat of the impact and then cooled to form glass, help scientists spot the original impact site of a meteor. Upon impact, melted material is thrown into the atmosphere, then falls back to the ground. Even if the original crater has disappeared due to erosion or is hidden by a shift in tectonic plates, tektites give the spot away. Tektites between 750,000 to 35.5 million years old have been found in every continent except Antarctica.

Keep Reading