Iran goes to the polls today, and people around the world are caring a little more than usual about an international election, because it would be simply excellent to not have Ahmadinejad around anymore spouting off about the Holocaust and making everyone feel nervous with his not-so-veiled nuclear threats. The election is shaping up to be a close one.But the chart above on how Iranian government functions and its accompanying explainer text makes it clear that the Iranian president may be more bark than bite. It’s still the (unelected) Supreme Leader who is making the decisions about the armed forces, and appointing half of the Guardian Council, a body that can veto any law and ban any citizen from standing for an election.Pre-Ahmadinejad, the reformist president Khatami clashed with the religious half of the government, and should any of the non-Ahmadinejad candidates manage to pull off a win today or in a run-off, it’s not like it will be easy sailing: Ahmadinejad wouldn’t be who he was if the Supreme Leader didn’t let him be, and the Supreme Leader will still be in charge.For updates on Iran’s election check out this site from the BBC and this one from The New York Times.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

