Here Are the Ten Most “Challenged” Books of 2014 According to the American Library Association

From kite runners to gay penguin families, these are the books your local librarians are fighting for

image via (cc) flickr user LansingLibrary

The American Library Association has released their annual “State of America’s Libraries” report, and for anyone interested in one of the country’s most important educational resources, it’s a must read.

The report offers a look at where things stand on a number of library-related issues, such as accessibility, diversity, and funding. It also addresses the role each type of library—Public, School, and Academic—plays in our society today. With two-thirds of Americans in agreement (when’s the last time you saw those words in sequence) that libraries have a positive impact on a community, the ALA’s report offers some encouraging news, including the fact that there has been a 54 percent increase in attendance at public library programming over the last decade, with nearly 100 million attendees in over four million programs across the country in 2012 alone.


But not all the news is quite so unambiguously uplifting. In the “Issues and Trends” portion of the report, the ALA lists the 10 most “challenged” books of the past year—books which, for a variety of reasons, were subject to censorship requests. The list was compiled by the American Library Association’s Office For Intellectual Freedom (OIF) from out of 311 challenges. The books therein represent a wide swath of styles, genres, and subject matter, as do the complaints leveled against them.

Per the ALA, the 10 most challenged books of 2014 are:

The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, by Sherman Alexie
Reasons: Anti-family, cultural insensitivity, drugs/alcohol/smoking, gambling, offensive language, sex education, sexually explicit, unsuited for age group, violence. Additional reasons: “depictions of bullying.”

Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi
Reasons: Gambling, offensive language, political viewpoint. Additional reasons: “politically, racially, and socially offensive,” and “graphic depictions.”

And Tango Makes Three, Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell
Reasons: Anti-family, homosexuality, political viewpoint, religious viewpoint, unsuited for age group. Additional reasons: “promotes the homosexual agenda.”

The Bluest Eye, by Toni Morrison
Reasons: Sexually explicit, unsuited for age group. Additional reasons: “contains controversial issues.”

It’s Perfectly Normal, by Robie Harris
Reasons: Nudity, sex education, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group. Additional reasons: “alleges it [to be] child pornography.”

Saga, by Brian K. Vaughan and Fiona Staples
Reasons: Anti-Family, nudity, offensive language, sexually explicit, and unsuited for age group.

The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini
Reasons: Offensive language, unsuited to age group, violence.

The Perks of Being a Wallflower, by Stephen Chbosky
Reasons: Drugs/alcohol/smoking, homosexuality, offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited for age group. Additional reasons: “date rape and masturbation.”

A Stolen Life: A Memoir, Jaycee Dugard
Reasons: Drugs/alcohol/smoking, offensive language, sexually explicit, and unsuited for age group.

Drama, by Raina Telgemeier
Reasons: Sexually explicit.

Using criteria established by author Malinda Lo, founder of, the OIF determined that eight of the 10 most challenged books of the past year contained “diverse” content, as defined by:

—Non-White main and/or secondary characters
—LGBT main and/or secondary characters
—Disabled main and/or secondary characters
—Issues about race or racism
—LGBT issues
—Issues about religion, which encompass in this situation the Holocaust and terrorism
—Issues about disability and/or mental illness
—Non-Western settings, in which the West is North America and Europe

In response to these censorship efforts, and in defense of readers’ first amendment rights, the report explains that the ALA is organizing “[c]onference panels and intellectual freedom advocacy efforts [...] to reverse this growing trend.”

If panels aren’t your thing, though, you can always show your support for these books by checking them out from your local library. But remember: As good as it might feel to take a stand against censorship, you’ll have to do so quietly, or risk a severe “shush-ing” from the library staff.

Deep down, though, I’m sure they’ll understand.


via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading