Why This Year’s Nobel Prize In Physics Matters

Major advances in neutrino research could someday mean big changes for the way we live our lives.

image via (cc) flickr user caseorganic

Contrary (or, at least, in addition to) what those of us raised on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle cartoons might think, “Neutrinos” are not fun-loving partiers fleeing persecution from Dimension X. In fact, they’re something even stranger: Part of the fundamental particulate structure of our universe. And while there is still much we don’t know about these inherently bizarre particles, recent advances by scientists Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B. McDonald–the just-announced winners of the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics–have begun to shed light on both what neutrinos really are, and how they could someday play a role in our everyday lives.

First, a brief primer: What is a Neutrino?

Got that? Tiny, nearly-weightless particles with some weird physical properties, that are created by atomic reactions.

So, why does Kajita and McDonald’s shared Nobel Prize win matter? Put simply, each scientist’s research (Dr. Kajita focused on neutrinos formed in the reaction between cosmic rays and Earth’s atmosphere, while Dr. McDonald studied neutrinos created by our sun) helped demonstrate that neutrinos are able to change between electron, muon, and tau “flavors,” or fundamental states. This, in turn, showed that however insignificant their mass may be, neutrinos do have some form of “weight” to them. As the Nobel prize committee wrote in their release announcing this year’s prize:

“For particle physics [the existence of neutrino mass] was a historic discovery. Its Standard Model of the innermost workings of matter had been incredibly successful, having resisted all experimental challenges for more than twenty years. However, as it requires neutrinos to be massless, the new observations had clearly showed that the Standard Model cannot be the complete theory of the fundamental constituents of the universe.”

In other words, by proving that neutrinos can change their fundamental states, thereby necessitating mass, Kajita and McDonald have dramatically shifted our understanding of the second-most populous (after photons, claims the Nobel Prize committee) particle in the universe. Based on this new insight into neutrino properties, scientists believe neutrinos could be used to observe and understand deep-space phenomena like supernova, the light from which could otherwise be obscured by cosmic debris. Beyond that, however, the more we understand neutrinos, the more we might be able to put these ephemeral bits of particulate matter to good use for ourselves, right here on Earth.

image via (cc) flickr user

Since neutrinos are able to move through matter almost entirely unimpeded, researchers believe there may be ways to harness them in order to send communications through the Earth’s core (as opposed to bouncing through satellites and cables around the planet’s curve) or scan for oil deposits and other subterranean minerals. And, since neutrinos are formed as a result of atomic reactions, they may even be ways to use them to detect illicit nuclear material. We’re not there yet, but doctors Kajita and McDonald’s discoveries offers a tremendous step in that direction.

In that respect, this year’s Nobel Prize for Physics is for both work done, as well as work yet to come., Kajita and McDonald’s discovery is just the beginning of a whole new field of research, which opens the door for future studies into the nature of this mysterious particulate substance. As the Prize committee writes: “New discoveries about [neutrinos] deepest secrets are expected to change our current understanding of the history, structure and future fate of the universe.”

[via newshour]

Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore

The common stereotypes about liberals and conservatives are that liberals are bleeding hearts and conservatives are cold-hearted.

It makes sense, conservatives want limited government and to cut social programs that help the more vulnerable members of society. Whereas liberals don't mind paying a few more dollars in taxes to help the unfortunate.

A recent study out of Belgium scientifically supports the notion that people who scored lower on emotional ability tests tend to have right-wing and racist views.

Keep Reading Show less