Cancer Survivor Saved By Obamacare Confronts Paul Ryan On Its Repeal

“I want to thank President Obama from the bottom of my heart...”

At a town hall moderated by CNN’s Jake Tapper, Jeff Jeans introduced himself to House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-WI, as an enduring Republican and someone who worked in both the Reagan and Bush campaigns. He said that he’s a small business owner who was once also opposed to the Affordable Care Act (rebranded as Obamacare by the GOP).

He then told Ryan, “Just like you, I hated the Affordable Care Act.” Then the law saved his life. At the age of 49, Jeans was diagnosed with a curable type of cancer. Doctors gave him just six weeks to live if he didn’t pursue treatment. That’s when the Affordable Care Act stepped in.

“Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, I’m standing here today alive,” he began. “I rely on the Affordable Care Act to be able to purchase my own insurance. Why would you repeal the Affordable Care Act without a replacement?”

This is the question on everyone’s mind. Ryan softened, claiming that the ACA was a failure and that Republicans would be repealing it and replacing it with “something better.” It’s hard to imagine what that could be considering that the GOP has only come up with the same old idea of putting those with pre-existing conditions in “high-risk pools.”

The idea of high-risk pools for insurance isn’t new. In a 2013 article in The Wall Street Journal, Ramesh Ponnuru and Yuval Levin detail a plan that would include subsidized “high-risk pools” of insurance plans for those with pre-existing conditions, combined with a tax credit that would be sufficient to cover “at least the purchase of catastrophic coverage.” Their conservative answer to the ACA claims it would strongly incentivize the purchase of health insurance without the so-called “individual mandate.”

The thing is that these pools were available in 35 states pre-ACA and they were largely ineffectual because they were typically underfunded and costs were too high to begin with for those who were eligible for the plans. It’s hard to believe the GOP would now be interested in funding these programs—considering they voted to cut funding to high-risk pools in 2013.

As Ryan set out to explain the problems with the ACA, Jean cut him off saying, “I want to thank President Obama from the bottom of my heart, because I would be dead if it weren’t for him.” Ryan didn’t quite have an answer for that.

What he does have is a lack of consensus, even among Republicans, on whether they should simply repeal the law and delay the replacement or repeal the law and replace it at the same time. Even as Mr. Ryan made this promise to Mr. Jean, “We want to do this at the same time, and in some cases in the same bill,” said Ryan. “So we want to advance repealing this law with its replacement at the same time.”

Yet, earlier this week in the dead of night, Senate Republicans took a first step to repeal the ACA, approving a budget resolution to have committees write legislation ripping apart parts of the law—including the parts that included the protection of veterans and those with pre-existing conditions.

Good question, Chuck.

via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading