This is the question every single pundit (and Twitterer) this side of, well, anywhere will be asking today. Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize win is a total headscratcher, that much is pretty much agreed upon.Is this an attempt to prevent the president from turning Afghanistan into another Vietnam? Is it a super-duper premature pat on the back? Is it merited? If so, for what?Some tools to aid you in your opinion forming:1. A list (with some analysis) of former winners.2. A list of other surprise wins.3. Some early opinions, some for, some tentative, and many against. (The Guardian is even asking if he should accept the award at all.)4. A look at some of the other people whose names were being floated for a win.At this early hour we had trouble finding a lot of punditry in support of the nod, but if you find some good ones, post them in the comments. And more importantly, what do you think?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

