GOOD

Reducing False Positives in Prenatal Genetic Screenings

Prenatal testing is worrisome enough, now researchers have discovered a simple reason for many inaccurate results.

Image via pixabay user Skitterphoto

Prenatal screening in its present form is a developing technology, constantly being spurred onward by the demands of curious expectant mothers worldwide. What mothers may not realize is that while low-risk testing for abnormalities may be more credible than, say, a horoscope, sometimes the results can be unreliable.


Designed to determine the probability, or the risk, of a baby being born with certain genetic abnormalities that may lead to defects or disabilities like Down’s Syndrome, screening tests have been plagued since inception by the issue of false positives. No doctor, computer, blood, or urine sample can predict with absolute authority whether a baby will emerge healthy or not, and mothers are understandably hesitant to gamble on the life and health of their newborn.

According to researchers at the University of Washington in a study published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, the accuracy of prenatal tests may be compromised if the pregnant mother’s genome contains abnormalities in the usual number of specific DNA segments. In a way, however, every woman’s chromosomes develop uniquely.

"The approach used in the screening tests assumes that every woman carries the same proportion of genetic material on a given chromosome," explained the researchers in the study.

In reality, the idea of a “normal” set of chromosomes is arbitrary. Chromosomes vary slightly in composition and size from person to person, and the body sometimes deletes and duplicates certain regions of certain genomes as it sees fit. Longer chromosomes are subjected to this process more often than shorter chromosomes, and these longer chromosomes are sometimes the culprits that trigger a false positive result during screening.

A maternal duplication of a genome effectively increases the length of a chromosome on which it resides, potentially resulting in the false reading of an additional chromosome. Image via Wikimedia Commons

Modern prenatal genetic screens analyze the mother’s blood during pregnancy, which is a safer and less invasive alternative than sampling the fluid surrounding the fetus in the uterus. These blood tests are routinely offered to pregnant women of an older age, who are at greater risk of bearing a child with certain genetic abnormalities. The likelihood of a false positive increases as the pregnancy progresses, as well as with increasing maternal age. Screenings done between 10 and 18 weeks of pregnancy result in a 5 percent chance of false positives, which jumps up to 10-15 percent in screenings done between weeks 18 and 22.

“Currently, the causes of false positive results are poorly understood,” the researchers noted in the study. “Once you’re aware of the problem, you’re obligated to address it.”

Once the problem is properly identified, addressing it can be as simple as anticipating the extra genomes that will show up on tests and adjusting the results to account for it.

False positive screening results can have a profound psychological effect on an expectant mother, and may lead to unnessecary, riskier further testing. A better understanding of what causes false positives could save pregnant women and their families months of anxiety and uncertainty.

Articles


September 20th marks the beginning of a pivotal push for the future of our planet. The Global Climate Strike will set the stage for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, where more than 60 nations are expected to build upon their commitment to 2015's Paris Agreement for combating climate change.

Millions of people are expected to take part in an estimated 4,000 events across 130 countries.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Apple

When the iPhone 11 debuted on September 10, it was met with less enthusiasm than the usual iPhone release. A lot of techies are holding off purchasing the latest gadget until Apple releases a phone with 5G technology.

Major US phone carriers have yet to build out the infrastructure necessary to provide a consistent 5G experience, so Apple didn't feel it necessary to integrate the technology into its latest iPhone.

A dramatic new feature on the iPhone 11 Pro is its three camera lenses. The three lenses give users the the original wide, plus ultrawide and telephoto options.

Keep Reading Show less
Health
via I love butter / Flickr

We often dismiss our dreams as nonsensical dispatches from the mind while we're deep asleep. But recent research proves that our dreams can definitely affect our waking lives.

People often dream about their significant others and studies show it actually affects how we behave towads them the next day.

"A lot of people don't pay attention to their dreams and are unaware of the impact they have on their state of mind," said Dylan Selterman, psychology lecturer at the University of Maryland, says according to The Huffington Post. "Now we have evidence that there is this association."

Keep Reading Show less
Health
Photo by Thomas Kelley on Unsplash

It's fun to go to a party, talk to strangers, and try to guess where they're from just by their accents and use of language. It's called 'soda' on the East Coast and 'pop' in the Midwest, right? Well, it looks like a new study has been able to determine where a Humpback whale has been and who he's been hanging out with during his awesome travels just from his song.

Keep Reading Show less
Science

There is no shortage of proposals from the, um, what's the word for it… huge, group of Democratic presidential candidates this year. But one may stand out from the pack as being not just bold but also necessary; during a CNN town hall about climate change Andrew Yang proposed a "green amendment" to the constitution.

Keep Reading Show less
test