Superb Idea: Airlines Should Have Dress Codes

Another person has been kicked off a plane because of his clothes. Why can't airlines define "inappropriate" attire?

The latest story eroding airline travel's already battered reputation begins with a pair of sagging pants. College football player DeShon Marman was kicked off his US Airways flight in San Francisco last week for sagging his pants too far, thus exposing his (underwear-covered) ass. Once off the plane, Marman was arrested for trespassing, battery, and resisting arrest, charges that jeopardize his University of New Mexico athletic scholarship. Adding insult to injury, just a few days before Marman, who is black, was singled-out for his "inappropriate" clothing, a white man in Florida was allowed to board a US Airways flight wearing only women's underwear.

The large gulf between acceptable plane clothing in San Francisco and Ft. Lauderdale has forced US Airways to admit that it doesn't have a formal dress code, meaning decisions about whether travelers are dressed appropriately are left to the discretion of airline employees with varying ideas about what constitutes indecency. Perhaps its time for US Airways, and all airlines, to finally enact a dress code.

Requiring travelers to show a modicum of formality would lose customers right off the bat, as some people are simply never going to give up their sweatpants and tank tops. However, a dress code would also save airlines a lot of legal hassle and bad press they risk when they allow their flight crews to arbitrarily decide whether something is inappropriate. In 2007, for instance, two women were admonished for their risque clothing on separate Southwest Airlines flights. That same year a man was banned from a flight in Australia for wearing an anti-George W. Bush shirt that said "terrorist" on it. And in 2005 a different anti-Bush administration t-shirt (this one read, "Meet the Fuckers") forced a woman and her husband off a Southwest flight in Reno, Nev.

Naturally, all of these people immediately went to the press with their stories and, if reports are to be believed, they also immediately began considering lawsuits. It's well within an airline's right to banish customers from flights, but it's a sticky situation when it does so without any prior indication about what constitutes a violation. To be sure, some airlines have written policies about customer attire, but most of those are like Southwest's, which bans clothing if it's "lewd, obscene or patently offensive." Of course, "obscene" is subjective—one man's "fuck" is another's "darnit"—making it useless as a rule.

Rather than pussyfooting around with watered-down, meaningless half-policies, it makes sense for airlines to come out and set some real guidelines. If you don't want people exposing their butts on your planes by sagging their pants, just come right out and say so. (Right now the words "clothes" and "clothing" never appear on the US Airways "General Policies" page.) It's legal—air travel is not a right, so just as nightclubs are allowed to demand that attendees not wear baseball caps, US Airways can ban customers who sag their pants.

Sure, airline dress codes would make the skies a little less friendly. But they'd be a lot more efficient.


The healthcare systems in the United States and the United Kingdom couldn't be more different.

The UK's National Health Service is the largest government-run healthcare system in the world and the US's is largest private sector system.

Almost all essential health services in the UK are free, whereas in America cost can vary wildly based on insurance, co pays and what the hospitals and physicians choose to charge.

A medical bill in the US

One of the largest differences is cost. The average person in the UK spends £2,989 ($3915) per year on healthcare (most of which is collected through taxes), whereas the average American spends around $10,739 a year.

So Americans should obviously be getting better care, right? Well, the average life expectancy in the UK is higher and infant mortality rate is lower than that in the US.

RELATED: The World Health Organization declares war on the out of control price of insulin

Plus, in the U.S., only 84% of people are covered by private insurance, Medicare or Medicaid. Sixteen percent of the population are forced to pay out of pocket.

In the UK, everyone is covered unless they are visiting the country or an undocumented resident.

Prescription drugs can cost Americans an arm and a leg, but in the UK, prescriptions or either free or capped at £8.60 ($11.27).

via Wikimedia Commons

The one drawback to the NHS system is responsiveness. In the UK people tend to wait longer for inessential surgeries, doctor's appointments, and in emergency rooms. Whereas, the US is ranked as the most responsive country in the world.

RELATED: Alarmingly high insulin prices are forcing Americans to flock to Canada to buy the drug

The New York Times printed a fair evaluation of the UK's system:

The service is known for its simplicity: It is free at the point of use to anyone who needs it. Paperwork is minimal, and most patients never see a bill. … No one needs to delay medical treatment until he or she can afford it, and virtually everyone is covered. …

According to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States spent 17.2 percent of its economic output on health care in 2016, compared with 9.7 percent in Britain. Yet Britain has a higher life expectancy at birth and lower infant mortality.

Citizens in each country have an interesting perspective on each other's healthcare systems. UK citizens think it's inhumane for Americans have to pay through the nose when they're sick or injured. While Americans are skeptical of socialist medicine.

A reporter from Politics Joe hit the streets of London and asked everyday people what they think Americans pay for healthcare and they were completely shocked.


Bans on plastic bags and straws can only go so far. Using disposable products, like grabbing a plastic fork when you're on the go, can be incredibly convenient. But these items also contribute to our growing plastic problem.

Fortunately, you can cut down on the amount of waste you produce by cutting down on disposable products. And even more fortunately, there are sustainable (and cute) replacements that won't damage the environment.

Coconut bowls


Who says sustainable can't also be stylish? These cute coconut bowls were handmade using reclaimed coconuts, making each piece one of a kind. Not only are they organic and biodegradable, but they're also durable, in case your dinner parties tend to get out of hand. The matching ebony wood spoons were polished with the same coconut oil as the bowls.

Cocostation Set of 2 Vietnamese Coconut Bowls and Spoons, $14.99; at Amazon

Solar powered phone charger


Why spend time looking around for an outlet when you can just harness the power of the sun? This solar powered phone charger will make sure your phone never dies as long as you can bask in the sun's rays. As an added bonus, this charger was made using eco-friendly silicone rubber. It's win-win all around.

Dizaul Solar Charger, 5000mAh Portable Solar Power Bank, $19.95; at Amazon, $19.95; at Amazon

Herb garden kit

Planter Pro

Put some green in your life with this herb planter. The kit comes with everything you need to get a garden growing, including a moisture meter that helps you determine if your herbs are getting the right amount of food to flourish. All the seeds included are certified to be non-GMO and non-hybrids, meaning you can have fresh, organic herbs right at your fingertips.

Planter Pro's Herb Garden Cedar Planter, $39.00; at Amazonedar Planter, $39.00; at Amazon

Reusable Keurig cups

K & J

Keurig cups are convenient, but they also create a ton of plastic waste. These Keurig-compatible plastic cups are an easy way to cut down on the amount of trash you create without cutting down on your caffeine. Additionally, you won't have to keep on buying K Cups, which means you'll be saving money and the environment.

K&J Reusable Filter Cups, $8.95 for a set of 4,; at Amazon

Low-flow shower head


Low-flow water fixtures can cut down your water consumption, which saves you money while also saving one of the Earth's resources. This shower head was designed with a lighter flow in mind, which means you'll be able to cut down on water usage without feeling like you're cutting down on your shower.

Speakman Low Flow Shower Head, $14.58; at Amazon

Bamboo safety razor


Instead of throwing away a disposable razor every time you shave, invest in an eco-friendly, reusable one. This unisex shaver isn't just sustainable, it's also sharp-looking, which means it would make a great gift for the holidays.

Zomchi Safety Razor, $16.99; at Amazon

The Planet
Instagram / Leonardo DiCaprio

This August, the world watched as the Amazon burned. There were 30,901 individual fires that lapped at the largest rainforest in the world. While fires can occur in the dry season due to natural factors, like lightning strikes, it is believed that the widespread fires were started by loggers and farmers to clear land. Brazil's president, Jair Bolsonaro, cites a different cause: the actor Leonardo DiCaprio.

DiCaprio wasn't accused of hanging out in the rainforest with a box of matches, however President Bolsonaro did accuse the actor of funding nonprofit organizations that allegedly set fires to raise donations.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet