Supreme Court Hearing on Same-Sex Marriage Case Suggests Split Opinions

All eyes remain on swing voter Justice Anthony Kennedy as well as Chief Justice Roberts.

On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court of the United States held a hearing on a set of landmark cases regarding same-sex marriage bans in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.

Image via Flickr user Sharon Mattheson-McCutcheon

The debate seeks to answer two related, yet distinct questions: whether all states are required by the Constitution to certify same-sex marriages, and whether same-sex marriages that take place in states that allow them should also be recognized in states that don’t. Currently, 37 states allow same-sex marriage, but in the 13 states that don’t, partners are not allowed the same rights as straight couples, such as the ability to adopt children and be recognized as the guardians of the child.

After two-and-a-half hours of oral arguments—more than twice the amount of time that most cases receive—the justices brought up strong points against lawyers representing both sides of the case, drawing a sharp ideological divide between the court. In the end, it is still not clear in which direction the Supreme Court is headed.

"We heard both of them in the arguments today showing support for both sides of the argument, showing skepticism for both sides of the argument," Steve Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at American University, told CNN. "I think the headline here is it's about what we expected. It's going to be close, it's going to be divisive and it's going to come down to Kennedy and Roberts."

Justice Anthony Kennedy has been known to regularly play the part of the swing vote in major decisions. His hold on the balance is considered the key vote by those who are challenging the state bans, as he has penned three decisions in favor of gay rights in the past. Some go as far as to say that what the Supreme Court thinks about same-sex marriage is really what Kennedy thinks about the issue.

While the justices will convene later in the week to vote on the matter, the court’s decision will remain unknown until it is revealed in late June. For transcripts of the arguments in support and against same-sex marriage bans, the Washington Post published an informative “Who Said What,” here.

via David Leavitt / Twitter and RealTargetTori / Twitter

Last Friday, GOOD reported on an infuriating incident that went down at a Massachusetts Target.

A Target manager who's come to be known as "Target Tori," was harassed by Twitter troll David Leavitt for not selling him an $89 Oral-B Pro 5000 toothbrush for a penny.

He describes himself as a "multimedia journalist who has worked for CBS, AXS, Yahoo, and others."

Keep Reading
via David Leavitt / Twitter

Anyone who has ever worked in retail knows that the worst thing about the job, right after the pay, are the unreasonable cheapskates who "want to talk to your manager" to get some money off an item.

They think that throwing a tantrum will save them a few bucks and don't care if they completely embarrass themselves in the process. Sometimes that involves belittling the poor employee who's just trying to get through their day with an ounce of dignity.

Twitter is rallying around a gal named Tori who works at a Target in Massachusetts after she was tweet-shamed by irate chapekate, journalist, and Twitter troll, David Leavitt.

Keep Reading
via Haldean Brown / Flickr

In a typical work day, people who smoke take more breaks than those who do not. Every few hours they pop outside to have a smoke and usually take a coworker with them.

Don Bryden, Managing director at KCJ Training and Employment Solutions in Swindon, England, thinks that nonsmokers and smokers should be treated equally, so he's giving those who refrain from smoking four extra days to compensate.

Funny enough, Bryden is a smoker himself.

Keep Reading