How Social Data Might Reinvent the Credit Score

All too often, one’s creditworthiness is mistaken for one’s trustworthiness.

All too often, one’s creditworthiness is mistaken for one’s trustworthiness. Our credit scores are used to determine 90 percent of credit decisions, and can affect whether we’re able to rent an apartment, buy a car, or even get a job. And for an awful lot of Americans, that’s a really big problem.

According to the FDIC, approximately 28 percent of U.S. households are un-or underbanked. That means they don’t have access to FDIC-insured institutions, and must attain their financial services from non-insured organizations like a non-bank lender or check casher (the home of nefarious “payday loans”). While some families or individuals may have opted out of the banking system entirely, the majority of the underbanked never had a choice in the first place: They simply don’t have the credit history to demonstrate that they are reliable borrowers.

Lately, however, there has been a push to find a way to replace or reinvent the current credit score. Even a young man named Louis Beryl—a graduate of Princeton, former Morgan Stanley employee, and, as he puts it, “just about the most low-risk person possible”—was flat-out denied by several private loan companies while he was attending Harvard business school. He needed a co-signer to guarantee his loan before he was approved.

Beryl went on to launch a company called Earnest in 2013 to help lower the high costs and barriers to credit faced by otherwise financially responsible people. Rather than viewing applicants as numbers, Beryl says Earnest assesses them as individuals—reviewing LinkedIn and other social profiles, education level, work history, utility payments, real-time payment behavior, cash flow, savings over time, salary, and earning potential—to determine whether someone might be a trustworthy borrower. Beryl describes Earnest as “more of a first resort than a last resort” for loans and credit; many loans are typically approved and fulfilled in under two days.

Earnest isn’t alone: LendUp similarly mines borrowers’ Facebook and Twitter accounts for factors that indicate whether they’ll be likely to default, as does Affirm, which also gleans information from cellphone accounts. Beryl says this kind of data analysis will become more and more common, especially as more young people approach financial maturity. Without a long credit history, even the most successful millennial may struggle with the asymmetrical gap between their online reputations and what banks traditionally care about.

For people who have less access than a former Ivy Leaguer, FactorTrust might be an option. This credit bureau was developed specifically for those without a financial institution, using a proprietary database of underbanked consumer loan performance and third-party data sources to determine creditworthiness.

FactorTrust CEO Greg Rable says that though “non-prime consumers” have been overlooked traditionally, they are finally able to get some attention through alternatives to the credit score. Rable is quick to add, however, that though social media data is an intriguing way to assess one’s social standing and professional connections, regulatory and compliance frameworks simply haven’t caught up with these kinds of innovations. Essentially, people who rely too much on the dream of the “social” credit score are as stranded as ever.

For more traditional financial stalwarts, there may be yet another way to assess credit newbies: Since November 2014, a new pilot program—still unnammed and developed by the Fair Isaac Corporation, Equifax, and LexisNexis Risk Solutions—has been trying to dig up the true value and meaning of our current credit score system, assessing whether there’s a better way to paint a complete, accurate picture of borrowers.

This new solution, though still in its infancy, could potentially upend our current socieconomic system, making auto loans, mortgages, credit cards, and jobs accessible to as many as 53 million new people by taking financial institutions out of the equation. Instead, the program will calculate a score based on consumers’ payment history when it comes to cable, cellphone, electric and gas bills, as well as how often he or she changes addresses, among other factors.

According to Jason Flemish, Vice President of Consumer Credit and Risk Products at Equifax, this kind of data is valuable because of two factors: the breadth of coverage, and predictability of the data source. “Real-time payment behavior data—such as how timely a consumer is when paying their cell phone bill—is a very desirable data source,” he said. “This is because it is a good indicator of how [well] the consumer would treat a future line of credit.”

It may seem like alternative data is all the rage right now, but Chi Chi Wu, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, warns that not all data is created equal. She says that data from utility companies in particular is problematic, as these bills can fluctuate wildly (think of a winter heating bill in Boston, for example), which may leave people falling short at certain times of the year—and even negatively impact their ability to get credit in the future.

Wu also points out there is a vicious cycle in this kind of credit reporting. If something bad happens—say an illness or accident—and leaves someone in a bad spot, instant real-time financial data may make it harder for borrowers to regain control of their personal and professional lives. Nearly fifty percent of employers use credit scores when making hiring decisions for some positions, says Wu.

“Using alternative data doesn’t get rid of those problems,” she says. “It’s a different type of data, but if you have a consumer who [faces unpredictable obstacles], they’re as likely not to pay their phone bill as anything else.”

Wu suggests the answer may lie in a combination of returning to fundamentals of underwriting—like getting to know customers’ ability to pay—alongside new methods of analysis. Earnest’s Beryl sees a rosier future. “Ultimately, we’re talking about people who are financially responsible paying far less through a more fluid system.”

NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less

Climate change means our future is uncertain, but in the meantime, it's telling us a lot about our past. The Earth's glaciers are melting at an alarming rate, but as the ice dwindles, ancient artifacts are being uncovered. The Secrets of the Ice project has been surveying the glaciers on Norway's highest mountains in Oppland since 2011. They have found a slew of treasures, frozen in time and ice, making glacier archeologists, as Lars Pilø, co-director of Secrets of the Ice, put it when talking to CNN, the "unlikely beneficiaries of global warming."

Instead of digging, glacier archeologists survey the areas of melting ice, seeing which artifacts have been revealed by the thaw. "It's a very different world from regular archaeological sites," Pilø told National Geographic. "It's really rewarding work.

Keep Reading Show less

When former Pittsburgh Steelers' center Mike Webster committed suicide in 2002, his death began to raise awareness of the brain damage experienced by NFL football players. A 2017 study found that 99% of deceased NFL players had a degenerative brain disease known as CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). Only one out of 111 former football players had no sign of CTE. It turns out, some of the risks of traumatic brain injury experienced by heavily padded adults playing at a professional level also exist for kids with developing brains playing at a recreational level. The dangers might not be as intense as what the adults go through, but it can have some major life-long consequences.

A new PSA put out by the Concussion Legacy Foundation raises awareness of the dangers of tackle football on developing brains, comparing it to smoking. "Tackle football is like smoking. The younger I start, the longer I am exposed to danger. You wouldn't let me smoke. When should I start tackling?" a child's voice can be heard saying in the PSA as a mother lights up a cigarette for her young son.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

On Tuesday morning, President Trump tweeted about some favorable economic numbers, claiming that annual household income is up, unemployment is low, and housing prices are high.

Now, just imagine how much better those numbers would be if the country wasn't mired in an economy-killing trade war with China, bleeding out trillion-dollar-a-year debts, and didn't suffer from chaotic leadership in the Oval Office?

At the end of tweet, came an odd sentence, "Impeach the Pres."

Keep Reading Show less

October is domestic violence awareness month and when most people think of domestic violence, they imagine mostly female victims. However, abuse of men happens as well – in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships. But some are taking it upon themselves to change all that.

Keep Reading Show less