Why CISPA is the Worst and How You Can Help Stop It

In case you missed the news and subsequent online uproar, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the controversial CISPA bill yesterday, sending it on its way to the Senate and White House, where President Obama has threatened a veto.
Now the internet has sounded its battle cry.
The stated purpose of CISPA, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection act, is to strengthen security, but the bill's broad language would allow it to seriously undermine privacy on the web, by making it legal for businesses and websites to share users' personal information with the federal government or other companies—without permission—and in some cases even if it means violating a signed privacy contract.
"Cybersecurity is a real problem, but Congress' latest CISPA bill tries to solve it by attacking the freedom of the internet," the Guardian wrote in a passionate editorial yesterday. "If you are eligible to vote in the United States, please take a break from whatever you're doing today and call your member of the U.S. House of Representatives."
The good news is, folks aren't taking this lying down. Privacy advocates, internet activists, and those of us that understand the far-reaching implications of the bill are rallying for a fight.
Here's what's been going on, and how you can get involved.
A video of Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian posted yesterday shows him (literally) calling on Google and Twitter to speak up against the bill. He encourages the rest of us to do the same. You can sign the petition here.\n
So why target Google? As The Huffington Post reports, "The corporate coalition that teamed up with web activists to take down the Stop Online Piracy Act in January 2012 was notably fractured during the congressional debate over CISPA." Google has not yet taken a public stance on the bill.
Today, the hacktivist group Anonymous is urging websites to go dark on April 22, hoping for a widespread internet blackout akin to the one that helped squash SOPA and PIPA last year. You can join that conversation and urge your favorite sites to go dark via #CISPABlackout.
And last but not least, you can take good old-fashioned step of speaking out. Internet advocacy groups Fight for the Future and Center for Rights are urging people to write (or better yet, call!) your representative and voice your opposition to the bill. They are also in the process of organizing a large protest against CISPA this spring.
Hey, it worked for SOPA. Let's do it again.
Click here to add protecting your privacy to your "To Do" list\n
Image via (cc) flickr user slmears91\n
via Barry Schapiro / Twitter

The phrase "stay in your lane" is usually lobbed at celebrities who talk about politics on Twitter by people who disagree with them. People in the sports world will often get a "stick to sports" when they try to have an opinion that lies outside of the field of play.

Keep Reading

The Free the Nipple movement is trying to remove the stigma on women's breasts by making it culturally acceptable and legal for women to go topless in public. But it turns out, Free the Nipple might be fighting on the wrong front and should be focusing on freeing the nipple in a place you'd never expect. Your own home.

A woman in Utah is facing criminal charges for not wearing a shirt in her house, with prosecutors arguing that women's chests are culturally considered lewd.

Keep Reading

In August, the Recording Academy hired their first female CEO, Deborah Dugan. Ten days before the Grammys, Dugan was placed on administrative leave for misconduct allegations after a female employee said Dugan was "abusive" and created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment. However, Dugan says she was actually removed from her position for complaining to human resources about sexual harassment, pay disparities, and conflicts of interest in the award show's nomination process.

Just five days before the Grammys, Dugan filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and her claims are many. Dugan says she was paid less than former CEO Neil Portnow. In 2018, Portnow received criticism for saying women need to "step up" when only two female acts won Grammys. Portnow decided to not renew his contract shortly after. Dugan says she was also asked to hire Portnow as a consultant for $750,000 a year, which she refused to do.

Keep Reading