GOOD

Why the Government Should Invest in Clean Energy

At a clean energy summit today, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said that, over the long-term, government support allows innovation to thrive.


The American idea of innovation centers on a lonely genius toiling in his lab or experimenting out in the field. That’s how Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb, Alexander Graham Bell created the telephone, and the Wright Brothers launched the first airplane. But the Wright Brothers didn't create the aerospace industry alone—that required some institutional support. Building on that idea, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu argued today at a clean energy summit in Las Vegas that, over the long-term, government support allows innovation to thrive.

The summit, which is in its fourth year, is convened by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and partners from the academic, business, and think tank worlds. Chu said in a speech this morning that the federal government must help incubate clean energy innovation in order for the country to prosper.


“The government played an incredibly intimate role in all the technologies that led to prosperity in the United States,” he said.

Take airplanes. The Wright Brothers made the first technological leaps into the atmosphere, but “by 1915, Europe had blown by what they had done,” Chu said. In World War I, it wasn’t American planes, but British, German, and French that used the most advanced technology. Only after the U.S. government had established the National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics and spurred competition by handing over mail delivery to private companies did the U.S. recapture the lead in aerospace engineering.

Just as America lost its technological lead in the years after the Wright brothers invented the airplane, the country has been losing ground to China in the clean energy industry, even though the first solar cells were made in America at Bell Labs. But today’s federal government can spur further clean energy innovation, Chu suggested. In the solar sector, for instance, the Department of Energy has created the SunShot initiative, which aims to make solar competitive with other forms of energy generation by 2020. And through the stimulus program, the department has been able to support clean energy research and development through loan guarantees, tax incentives, and grants.

But Chu suggested that the government could do even more. “Our scientific innovation and engineering machine […] shouldn't be taken for granted,” he said, adding that it requires investing in research and development and in scientific education. Chu also said that the country should create a renewable energy standard, mandating that an increasing portion of electricity nationwide should come from hydroelectric, geothermal, wind and solar sources. (More than half of states already have such standards.) Furthermore, he argued, the federal government should “seriously consider” creating an independent agency for clean energy development—a government organization that would start with $5 to $10 billion to invest in clean energy technologies, and reinvest the interest from those loans into new projects.

The U.S. government has never made significant investments in any energy research and development projects (with the exception of a short period in the late 1970s, when the oil crisis pushed the government to take an interest in alternatives to oil). It’s not only government officials like Chu that are advocating for more investment, though. Bill Gates and other entrepreneurs formed the American Energy Innovation Council to lobby the government to spend $16 billion on clean energy each year. In the scheme of government spending, that’s a fairly small sliver of budget. But as Chu pointed out, government support has driven innovation before, and it could do it again.

Photo (cc) via flickr user Idaho National Laboratory

Articles
via Alan Levine / Flickr

The World Health Organization is hoping to drive down the cost of insulin by encouraging more generic drug makers to enter the market.

The organization hopes that by increasing competition for insulin, drug manufacturers will be forced to lower their prices.

Currently, only three companies dominate the world insulin market, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Over the past three decades they've worked to drastically increase the price of the drug, leading to an insulin availability crisis in some places.

In the United States, the price of insulin has increased from $35 a vial to $275 over the past two decades.

Keep Reading Show less
Health

Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

Since the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in 1986, whale populations have been steadily recovering. However, whales in the wild still face other dangers. In the summer of 2018, four Russian companies that supply aquariums with marine animals captured almost 100 beluga whales and killer whales (aka orcas). After a public outcry, those whales are swimming free as the last of the captive whales have been released, the first time this many captured whales have been released back into the wild.

In late 2018 and early 2019, a drone captured footage of 11 orcas and 87 beluga whales crammed into holding pens in the Srednyaya Bay. The so-called "whale jail" made headlines, and authorities began to investigate their potentially illegal capture.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less
Business
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

The 2020 election is a year away, but Donald Trump has some serious ground to cover if he doesn't want it to be a historical blowout.

A Washington Post- ABC News poll released Tuesday shows that Trump loses by double digits to the top Democratic contenders.

Vice President Joe Biden (56%-39%); Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (54%-39%); Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont (56%-39%); South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg (52%-41%); and Sen. Kamala Harris of California (52%-41%) all have big leads over the president.

Keep Reading Show less
Politics