World Happiness Report Confirms That Inequality Is Bad for Global Well-Being

The goal of the report is to “enable policies that support better lives.”

Copenhagen, Denmark. You would be happy if you lived here. Image by GuoJunjun via Wikimedia Commons.

On March 20 we will all have the chance to celebrate the United Nations’ International Day of Happiness. In advance of that, the fourth “World Happiness Report” has been released, offering a measure of personal satisfaction in 157 countries.

The results are—well, they’re ok. Denmark was honored with the distinction of having the happiest residents for the third time, with Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, and Finland rounding out the top five spots. And as unsurprising as it is to see Scandinavians registering the highest amount of satisfaction with their lives, the countries with the least happy populations feel equally predictable: In descending order, Benin, Afghanistan, Togo, Syria, and Burundi fill out the bottom of the rankings, with neighboring countries in their regions filling the lowest 50 slots. In the measure of which country’s happiness level has fallen furthest since the last report, poor Greece took the biggest hit, likely thanks to its ongoing economic crisis.

The report is assembled by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, which is made up of economists, psychologists, and public health experts from around the world. The collective was formed by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. The goal of the reports is to use data on human happiness and research into subjective measures of well-being to “enable policies that support better lives.” Around 3,000 respondents from each of the countries surveyed were asked questions to help them evaluate their lives on a scale of zero to 10, with zero indicating the unhappiest possible sentiment.

The biggest difference between the fourth edition of the study and its predecessors is the assessment of how inequality affects well-being across various countries. Intuitively, researchers have found that people are happier when they live in populations with less inequality. The results of the report, unfortunately and unsurprisingly, find that these inequality gaps are growing, not shrinking.

“There has been increased inequality of happiness within most countries, almost all regions, and for the world as a whole,” reads the report. “Only one-tenth of countries showed a significant reduction in happiness inequality, while more than half showed a significant increase. The world as a whole and 8 of 10 global regions showed significant increases in well-being inequality from 2005-2011 to 2012-2015. We also found evidence that greater inequality of well-being contributes to lower average well-being.”

The report's top countries by happiness. Image via the 2016 World Happiness Report

The study points out that four national governments have appointed ministers of happiness—those in Bhutan, Ecuador, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela—and that other “sub-national” governing bodies are doing the same in order to improve people’s happiness levels. The problem with research like this is that it is inherently based on the subjective assessments of individuals talking about their own happiness, and how people evaluate their lives varies widely from country to country. But it can hardly be argued that it’s a bad idea for state and local governments to form happiness task forces, of sorts, to improve the well-being of citizens.

To close the report, the contributing scientists offered a hopeful note, saying, “Happiness is the product of many facets of society. Income per capita matters, as economists emphasize, but so too do social conditions, work conditions, health, pollution, and values (e.g., generosity) … Individual freedom matters for happiness, but among many objectives and values, not to the exclusion of those other considerations. Sustainable development and related holistic concepts (such as Pope Francis’s integral human development) are a better overarching guide to human well-being than the single-minded pursuit of income, or economic freedom, or other one-dimensional objectives.”

Screenshot via (left) Wikimedia Commons (right)

Greta Thunberg has been dubbed the "Joan of Arc of climate change" for good reason. The 16-year-old activist embodies the courage and conviction of the unlikely underdog heroine, as well as the seemingly innate ability to lead a movement.

Thunberg has dedicated her young life to waking up the world to the climate crisis we face and cutting the crap that gets in the way of fixing it. Her speeches are a unique blend of calm rationality and no-holds-barred bluntness. She speaks truth to power, dispassionately and unflinchingly, and it is glorious.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
Ottawa Humane Society / Flickr

The Trump Administration won't be remembered for being kind to animals.

In 2018, it launched a new effort to reinstate cruel hunting practices in Alaska that had been outlawed under Obama. Hunters will be able to shoot hibernating bear cubs, murder wolf and coyote cubs while in their dens, and use dogs to hunt black bears.

Efforts to end animal cruelty by the USDA have been curtailed as well. In 2016, under the Obama Administration, the USDA issued 4,944 animal welfare citations, in two years the numbers dropped to just 1,716.

Keep Reading Show less

The disappearance of 40-year-old mortgage broker William Earl Moldt remained a mystery for 22 years because the technology used to find him hadn't been developed yet.

Moldt was reported missing on November 8, 1997. He had left a nightclub around 11 p.m. where he had been drinking. He wasn't known as a heavy drinker and witnesses at the bar said he didn't seem intoxicated when he left.

Keep Reading Show less
via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore

The common stereotypes about liberals and conservatives are that liberals are bleeding hearts and conservatives are cold-hearted.

It makes sense, conservatives want limited government and to cut social programs that help the more vulnerable members of society. Whereas liberals don't mind paying a few more dollars in taxes to help the unfortunate.

A recent study out of Belgium scientifically supports the notion that people who scored lower on emotional ability tests tend to have right-wing and racist views.

Keep Reading Show less