5 Reasons Why You Should Thank a Teacher Today

Around the world, teachers have one thing in common—they’re vastly underappreciated. World Teachers’ Day can change that.

Today’s the day to thank the people who assigned the evens for math homework, made you memorize obscure verb conjugations, and (hopefully) inspired learning.

Sunday is the 20th anniversary of World Teachers’ Day, which UNESCO started in order to recognize the 1966 adoption of the ILO/UNESCO Recommendation Concerning the Status of Teachers. Underscoring that high-quality education requires high-quality educators, the document outlined standards in preparation, working conditions, and overall responsibilities of teachers.

You won’t find the word “standardized testing” in the recommendation—which covers instruction from nursery to secondary school. However, it does call tenure “essential in the interests of education,” a statement that could ignite an instant debate.

Policy arguments aside, teaching is far from an easy profession. That’s where World Teachers’ Day comes in. Show some overdue appreciation for those who didn’t just give you a warning for going up the slide (sorry kindergarten teacher Ms. O’Rourke!) but also offered enlightenment about the world and how it works.

“Strangely one of the most central, vital professionals to society does not receive the respect it deserves in some parts of the world,” UNESCO states.

While not all teachers will earn the Mr. Holland’s Opus treatment, it’s hard to argue that they don’t deserve a nice card (the better to show off those cursive handwriting skills!) or other expressions of gratitude today. If UNESCO doesn’t convince you teachers have it rougher than most, here’s five statistics showing how far away we still are from those 1966 expectations.

  1. We desperately need them. Millions of them.

According to UNESCO, nearly four million teachers will be needed worldwide by 2015 just to ensure that every child completes primary school. Broken down, that is 1.4 million new roles (as well as about 2.6 million more replacements) to achieve universal primary education.

A mere 81,000 are needed in central Asia, compared to a whopping 1.4 million in the sub-Saharan Africa region. As the 1966 recommendation suggests, changing the status of teachers is one way for “overcoming any existing shortage of competent and experienced teachers.”

  1. Fewer teachers means more crowded classrooms.

Class size is an issue mentioned in 1966 that persists in many countries today. “Class size should be such as to permit the teacher to give the pupils individual attention,” according to the ILO/UNESCO resolution.

Data from 2012 show that 21 students were in the average public primary school class, among OECD—or primarily industrialized—countries; 24 were in the average public lower secondary school class.

In the United States, which averaged 22 and 28 respectively, teachers in many states contend with classrooms filled with 30 students or more. However, those numbers pale in comparison to China, where the typical public primary classes had 38 students and their lower secondary counterparts had 52. So much for individual attention.

  1. They do much more than come up with lesson plans.

Lower secondary teachers—in the United States, think middle-school educator—spent less than 80 percent of class time on actual lessons. That’s according to the OECD’s 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) of nearly three dozen countries. (U.S. responses were not factored into the international average for failing to meet the required response rate.)

How is the rest of that time spent? About 13 percent (or 8 minutes in an hour class) is used on managing behavior. Another 8 percent goes to administrative tasks.

  1. Society may not have faith in them.

Yikes. 6.3 out of 10: That’s the average score from “Do you trust teachers to deliver a good education?”—a question the Varkey Gems Foundation asked in its 2013 Global Teacher Status Index.

However, as the organization notes, trust does not necessarily lead to academic success.

Finland, whose classroom successes are well known among comparative-education enthusiasts, had the second highest trust rating, a little more than seven. Thousands of miles away in Brazil, where respondents trusted teachers most, test scores were abysmal.

  1. Despite all of this, they still love their jobs.

Yup, that’s right. A resounding 91.2 percent of lower secondary teachers responding to OECD’s 2013 TALIS agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “All in all, I am satisfied with my job.” Again, that stat doesn’t include the United States. For what it’s worth, 89.1 percent of U.S. survey takers at least agreed with the sentence.

Thank a teacher today for being there, regardless of the external circumstances (e.g., funding, bureaucracy) that they contend with on a daily basis. A little appreciation can go a long way for those who, according to the resolution, do no less than contribute “to the development of man and modern society.”

Photo by Josh Couch on Unsplash

Christopher Columbus, Alexander Hamilton, William Shakespeare, and Sir Walter Scott are getting company. Statues of the famous men are scattered across Central Park in New York City, along with 19 others. But they'll finally be joined by a few women.

Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Sojourner Truth are the subjects of a new statue that will be on display along The Mall, a walkway that runs through the park from 66th to 72nd street. It will be dedicated in August of next year, which is fittingly the 100-year anniversary of the 19th Amendment that granted women the right to vote.

Currently, just 3% of statues in New York City are dedicated to women. Out of 150 statues of historical figures across the city, only five statues are of historical women, including Joan of Arc, Golda Meir, Gertrude Stein, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Harriet Tubman.

Keep Reading Show less

It's easy to become calloused to everyday headlines with messages like, "the world is ending" and "everything is going extinct." They're so prevalent, in fact, that the severity of these statements has completely diminished to the point that no one pays them any attention. This environmental negativity (coined "eco-phobia") has led us to believe that all hope is lost for wildlife. But luckily, that isn't the case.

Historically, we have waited until something is near the complete point of collapse, then fought and clawed to bring the species numbers back up. But oftentimes we wait so long that it's too late. Creatures vanish from the Earth altogether. They go extinct. And even though I don't think for a single second that we should downplay the severity of extinction, if we can flip this on its head and show that every once in a while a species we have given up on is actually still out there, hanging on by a thread against all odds, that is a story that deserves to be told. A tragic story of loss becomes one about an animal that deserves a shot at preservation and a message of hope the world deserves to hear.

As a wildlife biologist and tracker who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of animals I believe have been wrongfully deemed extinct, I spend most of my time in super remote corners of the Earth, hoping to find some shred of evidence that these incredible creatures are still out there. And to be frank, I'm pretty damn good at it!

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet

For more than 20 years. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) has served the citizens of Maine in the U.S. Senate. For most of that time, she has enjoyed a hard-fought reputation as a moderate Republican who methodically builds bridges and consensus in an era of political polarization. To millions of political observers, she exemplified the best of post-partisan leadership, finding a "third way" through the static of ideological tribalism.

However, all of that has changed since the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Voters in Maine, particularly those who lean left, have run out of patience with Collins and her seeming refusal to stand up to Trump. That frustration peaked with the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Keep Reading Show less
NHM Vienna/Hans Reschreiter

Wealth inequality has been a hot topic of discussion as of late, but it's something that's occurred all throughout history. Class structure is a complicated issue, especially when you consider that haves and have nots have been in existence for over 4,000 years.

A study published in Science took a look at over 100 late Neolithic and early Bronze Age skeletons found in a burial site in southern Germany. The study "shed light on the complexity of social status, inheritance rules, and mobility during the Bronze Age." Partly by looking at their teeth and the artifacts they were buried with, researchers were able to discover that wealth inequality existed almost 4,000 years ago. "Our results reveal that individual households lasting several generations consisted of a high-status core family and unrelated low-status individuals, a social organization accompanied by patrilocality and female exogamy, and the stability of this system over 700 years," the study said.

Keep Reading Show less
via / Flickr and Dimitri Rodriguez / Flickr

Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign looks to be getting a huge big shot in the arm after it's faced some difficulties over the past few weeks.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a leading voice in the Democratic parties progressive, Democratic Socialist wing, is expected to endorse Sanders' campaign at the "Bernie's Back" rally in Queens, New York this Saturday.

Fellow member of "the Squad," Ilhan Omar, endorsed him on Wednesday.

Keep Reading Show less