Keep Calm And Wash Your Hands

We see the signs, we know the drill—so why are none of us washing our hands?

Who knew handwashing could be so sinister? Photo via Unsplash

Handwashing is the world’s easiest DIY vaccine. We’re taught to do it when we’re young—and, in case we forget, there are visual reminders everywhere for us to keep at it. From government-sponsored billboards to restaurant bathroom signs in dive bars and five-star restaurants alike, it’s like we’re constantly on the verge of having our hands full of germs: literally.

An annual Healthy Hand Washing survey found that, while almost all Americans believe they should wash their hands, only 66 percent actually do it when using public restrooms. Yikes. Even fewer wash their hands for the recommended 20 seconds. Worse yet, an alarming 70 percent of people admit they routinely skip soap altogether, and just rinse with water—which isn’t going to do much to the trillions of germs they’re up against.

A handwashing sign from the National Archives. Times haven't changed much.

I can’t count how many times I’ve cringed as someone emerges from the restroom with nary a sound of running water or the blast of a hand dryer preceding them. I know as well as you that mounted somewhere is the good ole “Employees Must Wash Hands.” But just because we’re not on the clock doesn’t mean we can ignore the command to wet, lather, scrub, and rinse. It’s then that I had to ask myself: where did those signs come from, anyway? Do they really make or break our hygienic habits or the habits of those preparing and serving our food, especially when the stats are so grim?

Let’s dial it back to 1846, when Hungarian Doctor Ignaz Semmelweis was washing his hands before it was cool. He was the first to connect the dots between the lack of handwashing and the spread of infectious diseases, according to the CDC. While living in Vienna, his research briefly curbed an epidemic of deaths in one of the maternity wards at the hospital he was assigned to. Pregnant women were dying en masse due to the dirty hands of male doctors who routinely performed autopsies before examining their pregnant patients.

Semmelweis demanded that the doctors wash with a soap and chlorine solution, but like many new habits we try to adhere to, this one didn’t stick. In fact, doctors took offense to the accusation that they were the ones spreading the disease. It would be years before handwashing would be taken seriously in hospitals as a prevention against the spread of disease, and it would take a whole new century before the mandate would make the leap into our food laws.

A friendly—and hip—message from the CDC falls on deaf ears more than you'd think.

The first version of the Pure Food and Drugs Act in the United States was passed in 1906; the same year that Upton Sinclair’s infamous novel, The Jungle, exposed some unsavory practices in Chicago’s meatpacking industry, causing public outcry for better food regulations. But the food act was insufficient. As germ theory, medical science, and technology evolved, it didn’t go far enough to protect people against deceptive foods and dangerous additives.

After a five year battle between the FDA and Congress, the official FDA Food Code was finally established in 1938, and it has continuously evolved since then with a new version released every four years. The problem is that the food codes are federal recommendations—their enforcement comes through state and local laws, which vary depending on the mandates of each community.

[quote position="full" is_quote="false"]Only 66 percent of Americans actually wash their hands when using public restrooms. Yikes.[/quote]

On top of it all, ideas around what kind of soap, level of alcohol, and time of washing have changed a lot over time. Just this month, the FDA banned many antibacterial soaps previously thought to be safe, if not necessary, because of the risky chemicals involved. But the Food Code is still the standard of food sanitation and workplace protocols, raising the bar for things like food temperature and proper handling, and—yes—displaying those notorious signs you see in every bathroom.

It's hard to say when the first sign was drilled into that first bathroom wall, but evidence of state codes like New York’s required businesses to display signage as early as 1948. The concept of hand washing, hygiene, and germ-spreading was still pretty new even then, so it goes without saying that people needed a nudge toward to sink.

Don’t feel so bad, America: Hand hygiene across the Atlantic isn’t much better. A hygiene company in the UK anonymously monitored 100,000 people last year and found that only 66 percent of women and a tire-screeching 38 percent of men wash their hands after using the bathroom.

A similar sensory monitoring system has been proposed in the U.S. to hold people accountable for keeping clean, according to the New York Times. Because men are less likely to wash up (Sorry, guys, you’ve been found out), a Latvian designer created a super sexy urinal (if one ever could be considered as such) with a faucet and sink built-in, saving water and making it harder for dudes to walk away without washing. It’s being used throughout Europe and could possibly catch on in the U.S.

Because roughly 40 percent of us don’t wash our hands in public, it’s enough of a problem that the CDC still puts out regular campaigns to remind us of this most basic step in hygiene. They use graphics, co-opt memes, and even enlist famous literary references to grab our attention.

Some of our legislators don’t think this is an issue; in fact, one U.S. senator challenged the notion of state-enforced hand washing at all. The Republican from North Carolina claimed that a business like Starbucks—which sells over 20 billion dollars of sugary, caffeinated bliss each year—need not force their employees into basic human hygiene. No, Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina believes that the supreme lord of capitalism will sort the clean palms from the grimy ones. His assumption is that sensible Americans will shun non-hand washing businesses on their own, causing the profits of multi-billion dollar corporations to dissolve as fast as a urinal cake in the men’s room. If only protecting the public from dangerous fecal-oral pathogens, viruses, and bacteria were so simple. You’re welcome to join us back here on planet earth whenever you’re ready, Thom.

The FDA says that the “Big Five” foodborne pathogens transmitted from sick or unhygienic food workers include Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Salmonella, Shigella, and E. coli. Maybe you’ve heard of them in headlines alongside massive food recalls, hospitalizations, even death. This stuff is no joke, and it’s almost scary to think that we hold so much power, literally, in the palms of our hands. Now, go wash them!

via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.

Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet