Can A Popular Card Game Stop Donald Trump?

“If Trump is so rich, how come he didn’t buy this billboard?”

Cards Against Humanity, America’s crudest and most popular form of competitive fill-in-the-blank games, is no stranger to the 2016 presidential election cycle. In May, the company released the “Donald Trump Bug-Out Bag,” a duffel bag packed with emergency food rations, a gas mask, an application to become a Mexican citizen, and other tools for surviving “the collapse of civilization after Donald Trump is elected President.” In August, Cards released two themed expansion packs, one for each major party’s nominee, as a way to raise money for Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The promotion raised almost $400,000.

But in October 2016, the company went one step further, announcing the creation of its own super PAC, the type of political organizing committee enabled by a 2010 Supreme Court decision to spend unlimited amounts of money on political speech. The company dubbed it “The Nuisance Committee,” named after Cards Against Humanity co-creator Max Temkin’s grandfather Ira Weinstein’s experience during World War II. While interned in a POW camp in Germany, Weinstein formed with other prisoners the “Nuisance Committee,” designed to irritate their captors.

A press release announcing the super PAC’s formation noted, “The comparison here between Trump and Hitler is intentional.”

In its first move, the present-day Nuisance Committee bought a billboard outside Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport that read, “If Trump is so rich, how come he didn’t buy this billboard?” to promote a now-defunct website outlining Trump’s failure to pay income tax — which seems especially prescient considering an Oct. 1, 2016, New York Times report. Trump flew into Chicago the morning after the billboard went up.

Image via Cards Against Humanity/Tumblr.

GOOD talked to Temkin about the challenges of satire, the Nuisance Committee’s plans, and the importance of taking an absurd political reality seriously.

What inspired Cards Against Humanity’s foray into politics?

We had been thinking about how to do this election pack for a really long time. We had assumed it would be some sort of Clinton vs. Bush pack or Sanders vs. Cruz pack. We had the loose template of one pack for the Republican, one pack for the Democrat. People could pick between them, and we'd give all the money to the winning candidate. When it became clear that Trump was going to be the nominee, we just couldn't get our heads around it.

We really started to feel like the election was choosing between some sort of authoritarian fascism and American democracy. On the off chance that Trump's supporters buy more packs — or just from a comedy point of view, (as) people might be more interested in buying the Trump pack than the Hillary pack — ethically, we are not going to be able to sleep at night if we give this money to Trump.

How did these ideas develop into an actual political organization?

We knew that some of that money (from the America Votes expansion pack) we wanted to give to the Clinton campaign. We knew that some of that money, we wanted to gift to nonprofits and organizations that are working on issues like getting money out of politics and increasing transparency in American politics.

[quote position="left" is_quote="true"]The whole notion of having a super PAC is contrary to a lot of what I believe. But … you do materially what you can to win.[/quote]

But we also started thinking, we have an ethical responsibility to use all of the tools at our disposal — design, comedy writing, copywriting, all these things that we're good at — to do whatever we can to resist Trump.

That's where the idea of the super PAC was born. We created this super PAC as a way to do media buys, spend money, and organize against Trump. This political organization that is funded by Cards Against Humanity, but (is) an independent organization that can go out and try to get these issues into the news.

Why a super PAC?

The whole notion of it is disgusting. The whole thing is disgusting. Citizens United is a disaster for American democracy. The whole notion of having a super PAC is contrary to a lot of what I believe. But also, I'm sort of a progressive materialist. If you believe in the cause, you do materially what you can to win.

If your opponent is going to be spending tons of money and using all of these legal tools to outflank you, to say that we're going to stand on principle and we're not going to spend any money and we're not going to fight back and we're not going to advocate for our values using all the tools that the system provides, then how much can you really care about the cause? I feel so strongly about Trump that I will use whatever tools are legally available to try to stop him. Unfortunately, where we are in American democracy right now, that includes all these things that nobody likes.

What are The Nuisance Committee’s goals?

We have two mandates with the PAC. The first is: Get out to vote. You gotta get out to vote for Hillary. That's how we'll win the election. We are very involved in get-out-to-vote efforts. We're especially looking at college towns in swing states. You can expect us to have a lot of media buys in Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia. We're also looking at Utah and Arizona.

The other thing is the media has this insatiable thirst for Trump-related stories and trivia. Trump exploits that. He sort of arbitrages the media's unstoppable need for Trump stories by saying crazy stuff and getting millions of dollars of earned media whenever he tweets. A presidential candidate told the American public to go look at a sex tape on Twitter at 3:20 a.m. Not healthy. But meanwhile, every network is talking about Trump's tweets. I feel like we are able to exploit the media's thirst for Trump by doing these sorts of jokes. The more we can pick these provocative issues and do them in a surprising way, the more we'll get our share of the media on the other side. Turn that tactic that's been working really well for Trump against him.

Has comedy failed in this election? What makes jokes politically productive?

[quote position="right" is_quote="true"]The more we can pick these provocative issues, and do them in a surprising way, the more we'll get our share of the media on the other side.[/quote]

Satire didn't work in this election because here we are. The way you satirize a public figure, you find something that is absurd or exaggerated about them, and you take it to an absurd conclusion. You imagine the craziest thing that Trump can do, and then you posit that he does it. Well, you can't do that with Trump because he could plausibly say or do anything. There's nothing you can make up about the guy that he might not do tomorrow. He's a singularly difficult character to satirize.

I think where Cards has found some purchase and where we're trying to do something a little bit different, is we're trying to make jokes about ourselves. We're trying to look at our own perspectives and reactions. That's always going to be something that's honest. For example, talking about how we're really scared of Trump or what he means to us given our family histories, Jewish history.

Literally listen to what Trump says he's going to do and take it seriously. Don't exaggerate it comedically. Just listen to what he's saying. It's comically, brazenly evil. The mistake people make is they don't take it seriously.


"Seventy percent of the Earth is covered with water, now you camp on it!" proudly declares Smithfly on the website for its new camping boat — the Shoal Tent.

Why have we waited so long for camping equipment that actually lets us sleep on the water? Because it's an awful idea, that's why.

"The world is your waterbed," Smithfly says on its site. But the big difference is that no one has ever had to worry about falling asleep and then drowning on their waterbed.

RELATED: A ridiculous dad transformed Billie Eilish's 'Bad Guy' into a 3-minute long musical dad joke

While it is possible that one could wade into the water, unzip the tent, have a pleasant slumber, and wake up in the morning feeling safe and refreshed, there are countless things that could go terribly wrong.

The tent could float down the river and you wake up in the middle of nowhere.

You could have to go to the bathroom in the middle of the night.

This guy.

It could spring a leak and you could drown while wrapped up in eight feet of heavy nylon.

A strong current could tip the tent-boat over.

There isn't any way to steer the darn thing.

This guy.

Mashable shared a charming video of the tent on Twitter and it was greeted with a chorus of people sharing the many ways one could die while staying the night in the Shoal Tent.

Oh yeah, it's expensive, too.

Even though the general public seems to think the Shoal Tent is a terrible idea, according to the Smithfly's website, it's currently sold out due to "popular demand" and it will be "available in 6-8 weeks." Oh, and did we mention it costs $1,999?

via zoezimmm / Imgur

There are few more perniciously dangerous conspiracy theories being shared online than the idea that vaccines cause autism.

This has led to a decline in Americans vaccinating their children, resulting in a massive increase in measles. This year has already seen over 1,200 cases of measles, a disease that was eradicated in the U.S. nearly 20 years ago.

A 2015 Pew Research study found that 83% of Americans think the measles vaccine is safe, while 9% think it's not. Another 7% are not sure. But when you look at the polls that include parents of minors, the numbers get worse, 13% believe that the measles vaccine is unsafe.

There is zero truth to the idea that vaccines cause autism. In fact, a recent study of over 650,000 children found there was no link whatsoever.

RELATED: A new study of over 650,000 children finds — once again — that vaccines don't cause autism

A great example of the lack of critical thinking shown by anti-vaxxers was a recent exchange on Facebook shared to Imgur by zoezimmm.

A parent named Kenleigh at a school in New Mexico shared a photo of a sign at reads: "Children will not be enrolled unless an immunization record is presented and immunizations are up-to-date."

This angered a Facebook user who went on a senseless tirade against vaccinations.

"That's fine, I'll just homeschool my kids," she wrote. At least they won't have to worry about getting shot up in school or being bullied, or being beat up / raped by the teachers!"

To defend her anti-vaccination argument, she used a factually incorrect claim that Amish people don't vaccinate their children. She also incorrectly claimed that the MMR vaccine is ineffective and used anecdotal evidence from her and her father to claim that vaccinations are unnecessary.

She also argued that "every human in the world is entitled to their own opinion." Which is true, but doesn't mean that wildly incorrect assumptions about health should be tolerated.

She concluded her argument with a point that proves she doesn't care about facts: "It doesn't matter what you say is not going to change my mind."

RELATED: 12 medical professionals shared their most memorable anti-vaxxer stories and you won't stop face-palming

While the anti-vaxxer was incorrect in her points, it must also be pointed out that some of the people who argued with her on Facebook were rude. That should never be tolerated in this type of discourse, but unfortunately, that's the world of social media.

Here's the entire exchange:

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

via zoezimmm / imgur

The post received a ton of responses on imgur. Here are just a few:

"'In my opinion...' 'I believe...' That's not how facts work."

"You're entitled to your opinion. And everyone else is entitled to call you a dumbass."

"'What I do with my children is no concern to you at all.' Most of the time, true. When your kid might give mine polio, not true."

"If my child can't bring peanut butter, your child shouldn't bring preventable diseases."

It's important to call out people who spread dangerous views, especially how they pertain to health, on social media. But people should do so with respect and civility.


He photographed Nazi atrocities and buried the negatives. The unearthed images are unforgettable.

He risked his life to leave a "historical record of our martyrdom."

via Yad Vashem and Archive of Modern Conflict, 2007

In September 1939, the Nazis invaded Poland. By April 1940, the gates closed on the Lodz Ghetto, the second largest in the country after Warsaw.

Throughout the war, over 210,000 people would be imprisoned in Lodz.

Among those held captive was Henryk Ross. He was a Jewish sports photographer before the Nazi invasion and worked for the the ghetto's Department of Statistics during the war. As part of his official job, he took identification photos of the prisoners and propaganda shots of Lodz' textile and leather factories.

Keep Reading Show less
via Imgur

Every few years there's something that goes mega viral because people can't decide what it is.

There was the famous "is it blue and black, or white and gold" dress?

There was the audio recording that said either "yanny" or "Laurel."

Keep Reading Show less

Rochester NY Airport Security passing insulting notes to travelers caught on tape

Neil Strassner was just passing through airport security, something he does on a weekly basis as part of his job. That's when a contract airport security employee handed him a small piece of folded cardboard. Strassner, 40, took the paper and continued on his way. He only paused when he heard the security employee shouting back at him, "You going to open the note?"

When he unfolded the small piece of paper, Strassner was greeted with an unprompted insult. "You ugly!!!"

According to Strassner, and in newly released CCTV of the incident, the woman who handed him the note began laughing loudly.

Keep Reading Show less