A Designer's Approach to Philanthropy

Take out some paper and write down how you’d rate yourself as a philanthropist. Then write down the names of five people you know that you’d assign an equal or greater rating. On this scale, a one would be for occasional organization event attendees; five would be for regular volunteers of a few nonprofits, and 10 would be for philanthropists who have weaved do-gooding into their daily lives—maybe even into their careers.

I've had some great one-on-one conversations with the five I rank as 10. We’ve talked about why we’re as involved as we are and our motivations. A few of them acknowledged my reasoning with "you're rare." Only one of my top five is a designer by practice.

I invest much of my free time and energy into AIGA DFW, GOOD Local, other nonprofit organizations in Dallas, and mentoring programs, because it’s the only way I know to be. I love and feel the inherent need to be involved. I am an artist and writer, and inspiration fuels me. My motto is, “you have to be involved to be inspired.”

In high school, service was not only inspiration, but my ticket to scholarships. After college, it led to community, networking, mentors, and award-winning pro-bono projects. A lot of designers get involved for the same reasons, but most cease involvement when things have paid off (like cementing a great job), and they no longer see the value of trading in their free time. As the creative director of a well-established creative agency, and with a pretty good 13-year-old portfolio, I could tap out of the volunteer ring easily. But another key reason behind my involvement is the satisfaction of doing something good for the community, whether it be with craft, strategy, or plain heavy-lifting. This not only acts as a counter but also helps enhance the creativity spent on everyday work projects. It’s this involvement that guided me to appreciate that what designers do for a living is important, and can do more than help organizations create artifacts. Our training enables us to take big ideas and make them happen.

My goal as incoming president of our AIGA chapter is to grow our design community in strength and purpose. Into one that’s led by 10’s that influence and inspire the 1’s. By doing so, not only do we accrue the inspiration to make our work better, but we demonstrate the value of what we do to the larger non-design community. This has materialized into our current approach to the following challenges:

How do we fold AIGA and the design community into the larger philanthropic community of DFW and inspire members to give more of a damn about matters outside of design?

The challenge is reshaping the appeal of doing good outside of work and assuming that the enthusiasm of the 10’s is in fact, rare. We’ve repositioned the purpose behind extending our philanthropic efforts outside of the design community. Instead of saying “do this for the good of the community”—we’ve restructured the conversation to “by doing this, we do good for the community and show the value of what we do for a living in a different context to a greater audience—which translates into a community of better potential clients.”

How can we sustain and grow our current efforts?

Instead of focusing on the design community at large, we re-channeled our messaging towards affinity groups—identifying their individual motivations and positioning our leaders to align their values with the ones our organization wants to foster. Once we feed their needs, we’ll have the attention we need to offer them even more. This approach has successfully brought out community leaders who had stopped coming to industry shindigs, and members who previously didn’t assign any value to getting involved. We’ve seen these members not only join, but volunteer. And not only volunteer, but ask to join our leadership.

How can we encourage and grow our leaders’ involvement, commitment and personal fulfillment?

The key to tripling the size and effectiveness of our board over this last summer was to seek and embed like-minded “rarities” into the core of our team. To sustain their involvement, we’ve committed to teach these leaders to be better leaders. At each board meeting, we share lessons meant not only to encourage them to be better leaders in our organization, but help position them to be better leaders, managers, and team members—tools they can use at work. That core of 10’s then encourages and mentors the 5’s and 1’s, and we inspire everyone to feel vested in our mission by opening up opportunities to contribute no matter their threshold of commitment.

To sustain and grow our organization in strength and purpose, we’re addressing everyone and their motivations—whether they be a lapsed community member or a highly-involved leader—as rarities. We put in a framework of trickle-down mentoring, inspiration, and encouragement. We know that the more each rarity grows involved, the more they grow inspired. We are approaching our challenges with the mindset of a designer solving a problem, and with that we can visualize a community of designer-do-gooders where being a 10 on the philanthropic scale becomes the norm.

Illustration by Frances Yllana

via Chela Horsdal / Twitter

Amazon's "The Man in the High Castle" debuted the first episode of its final season last week.

The show is loosely based on an alternative history novel by Philip K. Dick that postulates what would happen if Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan controlled the United States after being victorious in World War II.

Keep Reading Show less
via Mike Mozart / Flickr

Chick-fil-A is the third-largest fast food chain in America, behind McDonald's and Starbucks, raking in over $10 billion a year.

But for years, the company has faced boycotts for supporting anti-LGBT charities, including the Salvation Army, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Paul Anderson Youth Home.

The Salvation Army faced criticism after a leader in the organization implied that gay people "deserve to die" and the company also came under fire after refusing to offer same-sex couples health insurance. But the organization swears it's evolving on such issues.

via Thomas Hawk / Flickr

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes explicitly announced it was anti gay marriage in a recent "Statement of Faith."

God instituted marriage between one man and one woman as the foundation of the family and the basic structure of human society. For this reason, we believe that marriage is exclusively the union of one man and one woman.

The Paul Anderson Youth Home teaches boys that homosexuality is wrong and that same-sex marriage is "rage against Jesus Christ and His values."

RELATED: The 1975's singer bravely kissed a man at a Dubai concert to protest anti-LGBT oppression

In 2012, Chick-fil-A's CEO, Dan Cathy, made anti same-sex marriage comments on a radio broadcast:

I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, "We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage". I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.

But the chicken giant has now decided to change it's says its charitable donation strategy because it's bad for business...Not because being homophobic is wrong.

The company recently lost several bids to provide concessions in U.S. airports. A pop-up shop in England was told it would not be renewed after eight days following LGBTQ protests.

Chick-fil-A also has plans to expand to Boston, Massachusetts where its mayor, Thomas Menino, pledged to ban the restaurant from the city.

via Wikimedia Commons

"There's no question we know that, as we go into new markets, we need to be clear about who we are," Chick-fil-A President and Chief Operating Officer Tim Tassopoulos told Bisnow. "There are lots of articles and newscasts about Chick-fil-A, and we thought we needed to be clear about our message."

RELATED: Alan Turing will appear on the 50-pound note nearly 70 years after being persecuted for his sexuality

Instead, the Chick-fil-A Foundation plans to give $9 million to organizations that support education and fight homelessness. Which is commendable regardless of the company's troubled past.

"If Chick-Fil-A is serious about their pledge to stop holding hands with divisive anti-LGBTQ activists, then further transparency is needed regarding their deep ties to organizations like Focus on the Family, which exist purely to harm LGBTQ people and families," Drew Anderson, GLAAD's director of campaigns and rapid response, said in a statement.

Chick-fil-A's decision to back down from contributing to anti-LGBT charities shows the power that people have to fight back against companies by hitting them where it really hurts — the pocket book.

The question remains: If you previously avoided Chick-fil-A because it supported anti-LGBT organizations, is it now OK to eat there? Especially when Popeye's chicken sandwich is so good people will kill for it?


Oh, irony. You are having quite a day.

The Italian region of Veneto, which includes the city of Venice, is currently experiencing historic flooding. Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro has stated that the flooding is a direct result of climate change, with the tide measuring the highest level in 50 years. The city (which is actually a collection of 100 islands in a lagoon—hence its famous canal streets), is no stranger to regular flooding, but is currently on the brink of declaring a state of emergency as waters refuse to recede.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr and nrkbeta / flickr

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) dropped a bombshell on Tuesday, announcing it had over 900 emails that White House aide Stephen Miller sent to former Breitbart writer and editor Katie McHugh.

According to the SPLC, in the emails, Miller aggressively "promoted white nationalist literature, pushed racist immigration stories and obsessed over the loss of Confederate symbols after Dylann Roof's murderous rampage."

Keep Reading Show less
via Twitter / Bye,Bye Harley Davidson

The NRA likes to diminish the role that guns play in fatal shootings by saying, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

Which is the same logic as, "Hammers don't build roofs, people build roofs." No duh. But it'd be nearly impossible to build a roof without a hammer.

So, shouldn't the people who manufacture guns share some responsibility when they are used for the purpose they're made: killing people? Especially when the manufacturers market the weapon for that exact purpose?

Keep Reading Show less