There’s an interesting piece by Bryan Walsh out today, about whether or not Obama is “green enough.” Walsh, an environment reporter for Time (who has also graced our pages), looks at the big moves Obama has made since he took office, asking if they go far enough to get us where we need in terms of energy and environment policy.Obama is great at reaching across the aisle. We know this. The central question, then, is: Are the compromises necessitated by that kind of consensus-building too great? Greenpeace thinks so (though, to be fair, as watchdogs, it’s sort of their job to). Their executive director-outrageously, in my opinion-called Obama “completely missing in action” in regards to global warming issues, and the organization was critical of the administration’s controversial decision to limit the scope of the Endangered Species Act.Of course there are many who think he’s doing a swell job. What do you think?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

