Max Baucus is a Democratic senator from Montana. He’s also the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and, because a health care reform bill has to pass through that committee, he’s the guy who’s currently charged with creating a bill and shepherding it through the Senate. Some say he’s been holding the process hostage, and there are concerns because he’s so tight with the insurance companies.He just released his first draft of a bill today. You can download the whole thing here (pdf). It’s 220 pages long, and it’s hardly Harry Potter, but it’s not too technical to understand either if you want to give it a shot.Ezra Klein is doing a fantastic job of going through the Baucus draft bill to help us all understand what it means. Some of his early findings: The Baucus bill allows insurance companies to crank premiums way up for old people. But, while there’s no public option, the bill’s version of Health Insurance Exchanges is surprisingly good. He also covers the fiscal implications: “According to the CBO, the bill covers 94 percent of legal residents and actually reduces the deficit. More to the point, it keeps reducing the deficit as time goes on.”For some good background on how Baucus has been dealing with this responsibility, check the Columbia Journalism Review’s Baucus Watch series.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

