Binders Full of Women: For College Grads, the Pay Gap Is Alive and Well

A new report from the American Association of University of Women reveals that the pay gap is alive and well.

Two weeks after undecided voter Katherine Fenton asked President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney how they planned "to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn?" the internet is still snarking on Romney's now infamous "binders full of women" reply. But Fenton's question needs answering more than ever. According to "Graduating to a Pay Gap", a just-released report from the American Association of University of Women, one year after graduation, women are only being paid 82 cents for every dollar earned by their male peers.

The report looked at data on grads from 2009, the most recent year available and confirmed what we all know: the pay gap is alive and well. Although "education and occupational differences between men and women" explain part of the pay gap—men are more likely than women, for example, to major in higher paying fields like engineering and computer science while women dominate low paying majors like education and social science—a full one-third of the gap "cannot be explained by any of the factors commonly understood to affect earnings."

A year after receiving their degrees, "a hypothetical pair of graduates—one man and one woman—from the same university who majored in the same field," and work full time for the same number of hours per week in the exact same job won't earn the same salary. How bad is the gap? The woman would earn roughly 7 percent less than the man. That might not seem like much to some, but, as the report notes,"having less money means that women have more limited choices." When that woman is coming out of college with the same amount of student loan debt as the man, she has less cash to pay the monthly bill, and that affects her for the rest of her life.

Which brings us back to Fenton's question—the same one that's been asked by countless women over the years: How do we fix this? The AAUW says a first step is for society to actually recognize the pay gap as a problem. "Too often," the report says, "both women and men dismiss the pay gap as simply a matter of different choices."

One of the AAUW's suggestions is one that most businesses won't appreciate: an end to pay secrecy. There's less discrimination in public sector jobs than in the private sector because pay is, well, public. People may not know exactly what their colleagues earn, but salary ranges for positions are usually transparent—only 16 percent of public sector workers are forbidden or strongly discouraged from sharing what they earn.

In contrast, a full 61 percent of private sector employees are "either forbidden or strongly discouraged from discussing their pay with colleagues." It's a whole lot easier to not pay a woman what she deserves when she has no idea that she's being discriminated against every time her paycheck's printed.

The Lilly Ledbetter Act of 2009, which President Obama referenced during the debate is a step in the right direction. However, the AAUW also recommends a reintroduction of the Paycheck Fairness Act, legislation that would expand the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. It's been twice introduced and defeated by Congress. If we want future generations of women—whether they have a degree or not—to be paid equitably, we have to take action.

Want to help put it back on Congress' agenda? Drop your representative a message here.

Female graduate with thoughtful expression photo via Shutterstock

Center for American Progress Action Fund

Tonight's Democratic debate is a must-watch for followers of the 2020 election. And it's a nice distraction from the impeachment inquiry currently enveloping all of the political oxygen in America right now.

For most people, the main draw will be newly anointed frontrunner Pete Buttigieg, who has surprisingly surged to first place in Iowa and suddenly competing in New Hampshire. Will the other Democrats attack him? How will Elizabeth Warren react now that she's no longer sitting alone atop the primary field? After all, part of Buttigieg's rise has been his criticisms of Warren and her refusal to get into budgetary specifics over how she'd pay for her healthcare plan.

The good news is that Joe Biden apparently counts time travel amongst his other resume-building experience.

Keep Reading Show less
Official White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert

This election cycle, six women threw their hat in the ring for president, but is their gender holding them back? Would Americans feel comfortable with a woman leading the free world? Based on the last election, the answer is a swift no. And a new study backs this up. The study found that only 49% of American men would feel very comfortable with a woman serving as the head of the government. By comparison, 59% of women said they would feel comfortable with a woman in charge.

The Reykjavik Index for Leadership, which measures attitude towards women leaders, evaluated the attitudes of those living in the G7 countries as well as Brazil, China, India, and Russia. 22,000 adults in those 11 countries were surveyed on their attitudes about female leadership in 22 different sectors, including government, fashion, technology, media, banking and finance, education, and childcare.

Only two countries, Canada and the U.K., had a majority of respondents say they would be more comfortable with a female head of state. Germany (which currently has a female Chancellor), Japan, and Russia were the countries least comfortable with a female head of state.

Keep Reading Show less
via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

If you are totally ready to move on from Donald Trump, you're not alone. According to a report last April from the Wason Center National Survey of 2020 Voters, "President Trump will be the least popular president to run for reelection in the history of polling."

Yes, you read that right, "history of polling."

Keep Reading Show less
via Around the NFL / Twitter

After three years on the sidelines, Colin Kapernick will be working out for multiple NFL teams on Saturday, November 16 at the Atlanta Falcons facility.

The former 49er quarterback who inflamed the culture wars by peacefully protesting against social injustice during the national anthem made the announcement on Twitter Tuesday.

Kaepernick is scheduled for a 15-minute on-field workout and an interview that will be recorded and sent to all 32 teams. The Miami Dolphins, Dallas Cowboys, and Detroit Lions are expected to have representatives in attendance.

RELATED: Joe Namath Says Colin Kaepernick And Eric Reid Should Be Playing In The NFL

"We like our quarterback situation right now," Miami head coach, Brian Flores said. "We're going to do our due diligence."

NFL Insider Steve Wyche believes that the workout is the NFL's response to multiple teams inquiring about the 32-year-old quarterback. A league-wide workout would help to mitigate any potential political backlash that any one team may face for making an overture to the controversial figure.

Kapernick is an unrestricted free agent (UFA) so any team could have reached out to him. But it's believed that the interested teams are considering him for next season.

RELATED: Video of an Oakland train employee saving a man's life is so insane, it looks like CGI

Earlier this year, Kaepernick and Carolina Panthers safety Eric Reid reached a financial settlement with the league in a joint collusion complaint. The players alleged that the league conspired to keep them out after they began kneeling during the national anthem in 2016.

Before the 2019 season, Kaepernick posted a video of himself working out on twitter to show he was in great physical condition and ready to play.

Kaepnick took the 49ers to the Super Bowl in 2012 and the NFC Championship game in 2013.

He has the 23rd-highest career passer rating in NFL history, the second-best interception rate, and the ninth-most rushing yards per game of any quarterback ever. In 2016, his career to a sharp dive and he won only of 11 games as a starter.